The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads the LLM Stats Score 52.0 to 45.1. GPT-5.6 Luna is 1.2x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.0 to 45.1, ranking #12 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, GPT-5.6 Luna is roughly 1.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.6 Luna also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.0 and ranks #12 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna

  • cost matters — it's about 1.2x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
52.0
#12
45.1
#32
50.0
#15
44.2
#37
40.4
#12
36.3
#21
37.6
#13
31.6
#29
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 5
2 of 5
Input price
$0.43 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,050,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
GPT-5.6 Luna
41.0#10
28.8#90
31.3#10
25.8#33
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 · 45 for GPT-5.6 Luna

5 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AutomationBench, Terminal-Bench 2.1, Toolathlon), while GPT-5.6 Luna is better at 2 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, DeepSWE).

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-5.6 Luna costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($0.43/1M tokens) is 2.2x more expensive than GPT-5.6 Luna ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($0.87/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is more expensive than GPT-5.6 Luna.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Input tokens$0.43
Output tokens$0.87
Best providerDeepSeek
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.6 Luna accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813's 1,048,576 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while GPT-5.6 Luna is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Luna
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-5.6 Luna supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 does not.

GPT-5.6 Luna can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5.6 Luna

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is licensed under MIT, while GPT-5.6 Luna uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

MIT

Open weights

GPT-5.6 Luna

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released on 2026-08-13, while GPT-5.6 Luna was released on 2026-07-09.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is 1 month newer than GPT-5.6 Luna.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Aug 13, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer
GPT-5.6 Luna

Jul 9, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.6 Luna has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-16, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.6 Luna's training data extends to 2026-02-16, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

GPT-5.6 Luna

Feb 2026

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Novita, Together. GPT-5.6 Luna is available from OpenAI.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.96/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.96/1M

GPT-5.6 Luna

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and GPT-5.6 Luna side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
✓ Preferred
GPT-5.6 Luna
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs GPT-5.6 Luna.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or GPT-5.6 Luna?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads the LLM Stats Score 52.0 to 45.1. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is made by DeepSeek and GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 compare to GPT-5.6 Luna in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.9%, CyberGym: 83.3%, Toolathlon: 74.1%, DSBench-FullStack: 71.1%, DSBench-Hard: 67.2%. GPT-5.6 Luna scores Connectors: 99.9%, HealthBench Consensus: 95.1%, GPQA: 92.3%, Search and Function-Calling: 89.7%, Capture-the-Flag Challenges (Internal): 85.2%.

Is DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna is 2.2x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output via deepseek. GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and GPT-5.6 Luna?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-5.6 Luna supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and GPT-5.6 Luna?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.0 vs 45.1), context window (1.0M vs 1.1M), input pricing ($0.43 vs $0.20/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and GPT-5.6 Luna?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is developed by DeepSeek and GPT-5.6 Luna is developed by OpenAI.