Model Comparison
Devstral Small 1.1 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWhich is better in 2026?
Comparing Devstral Small 1.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Verdict: Devstral Small 1.1 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct — which is better?
Devstral Small 1.1 (by Mistral AI) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
On price, Devstral Small 1.1 is roughly 2.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Devstral Small 1.1 if…
- cost matters — it's about 2.2x cheaper per token
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Devstral Small 1.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.70/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is more expensive than Devstral Small 1.1.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has 7.0B more parameters than Devstral Small 1.1, making it 29.2% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Devstral Small 1.1's 128,000 tokens. Devstral Small 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Devstral Small 1.1 does not.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Devstral Small 1.1
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Devstral Small 1.1 was released on 2025-07-11, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 2 months newer than Devstral Small 1.1.
Jul 11, 2025
1.1 years ago
Sep 22, 2025
10 months ago
2mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Devstral Small 1.1 is available from Mistral AI. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from Novita, DeepInfra.
Devstral Small 1.1
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Devstral Small 1.1
View detailsMistral AI
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Devstral Small 1.1 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Devstral Small 1.1 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.