The AI arena is free today

Open Playground

Model Comparison

Magistral Medium vs Qwen3 MaxWhich is better in 2026?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Verdict: Magistral Medium vs Qwen3 Max — which is better?

Magistral Medium (by Mistral AI) and Qwen3 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Magistral Medium outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 Max is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Choose Magistral Medium if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3 Max if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Magistral Medium outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 Max is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Fri Aug 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

976.0B diff

Qwen3 Max has 976.0B more parameters than Magistral Medium, making it 4066.7% larger.

Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
24.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
1.0Tparameters
24.0B
Magistral Medium
1000.0B
Qwen3 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 Max specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 Max specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Aug 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 Max does not.

Magistral Medium can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Magistral Medium is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3 Max uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10, while Qwen3 Max was released on 2025-12-15.

Qwen3 Max is 6 months newer than Magistral Medium.

Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

1.2 years ago

Qwen3 Max

Dec 15, 2025

7 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Medium has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while Qwen3 Max's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Magistral Medium's training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 Max's cutoff date.

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

Qwen3 Max

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (70.8% vs 62.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (81.6% vs 64.9%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Magistral Medium and Qwen3 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Magistral Medium
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 Max
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max

FAQ

Common questions about Magistral Medium vs Qwen3 Max.

Which is better, Magistral Medium or Qwen3 Max?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI and Qwen3 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Magistral Medium compare to Qwen3 Max in benchmarks?

Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%. Qwen3 Max scores AIME 2025: 81.6%, t2-bench: 74.8%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.0%, SuperGPQA: 65.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Magistral Medium and Qwen3 Max?

Magistral Medium supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Magistral Medium and Qwen3 Max?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Magistral Medium and Qwen3 Max?

Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen3 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.