The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 7.2.

Microsoft · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 7.2, ranking #11 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Max wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8 Max

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.9 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
7.2
#288
51.9
#11
7.5
#279
50.6
#11
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$1.65 / M
Output price
— / M
$4.95 / M
Context window
256,000

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for Phi 4 Mini Reasoning · 42 for Qwen3.8 Max

1 shared

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Max is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2396.2B diff

Qwen3.8 Max has 2396.2B more parameters than Phi 4 Mini Reasoning, making it 63057.9% larger.

Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
3.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
2.4Tparameters
3.8B
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2400.0B
Qwen3.8 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8 Max specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.8 Max specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Max supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini Reasoning does not.

Qwen3.8 Max can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.8 Max uses Qwen3.8-Max License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8-Max License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30, while Qwen3.8 Max was released on 2026-08-02.

Qwen3.8 Max is 15 months newer than Phi 4 Mini Reasoning.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3.8 Max

Aug 2, 2026

1 months ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Qwen3.8 Max's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.8 Max's cutoff date.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Feb 2025

Qwen3.8 Max

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi 4 Mini Reasoning and Qwen3.8 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Mini Reasoning vs Qwen3.8 Max.

Which is better, Phi 4 Mini Reasoning or Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 7.2. Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is made by Microsoft and Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Phi 4 Mini Reasoning compare to Qwen3.8 Max in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning scores MATH-500: 94.6%, AIME: 57.5%, GPQA: 52.0%. Qwen3.8 Max scores PaperBench: 93.0%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 92.9%, GPQA: 92.6%, VideoMME w sub.: 90.4%, RealWorldQA: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi 4 Mini Reasoning and Qwen3.8 Max?

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.8 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Mini Reasoning and Qwen3.8 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.2 vs 51.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Qwen3.8-Max License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Mini Reasoning and Qwen3.8 Max?

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3.8 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.