The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 28.1. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 2.5x cheaper per token.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 28.1, ranking #11 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Max wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is roughly 2.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

  • cost matters — it's about 2.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window

Choose Qwen3.8 Max

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.9 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
28.1
#134
51.9
#11
28.4
#127
50.6
#11
11.5
#107
37.7
#12
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.30 / M
$1.65 / M
Output price
$3.00 / M
$4.95 / M
Context window
262,144
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Qwen3.8 Max
31.3#69
33.8#52
12.1#105
37.7#5
10.8#118
31.9#8
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

25 reported for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 · 42 for Qwen3.8 Max

2 shared

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Max is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam).

Qwen3.8 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs less

For input processing, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 5.5x cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max ($1.65/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max ($4.95/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.8 Max is more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerFireworks
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
Input tokens$1.65
Output tokens$4.95
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2165.0B diff

Qwen3.8 Max has 2165.0B more parameters than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507, making it 921.3% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
235.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
2.4Tparameters
235.0B
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
2400.0B
Qwen3.8 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Qwen3.8 Max's 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Max supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 does not.

Qwen3.8 Max can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.8 Max uses Qwen3.8-Max License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8-Max License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 was released on 2025-07-25, while Qwen3.8 Max was released on 2026-08-02.

Qwen3.8 Max is 12 months newer than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Jul 25, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3.8 Max

Aug 2, 2026

1 months ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is available from Fireworks, Novita. Qwen3.8 Max is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Novita, Together.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Qwen3.8 Max

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.65/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.95/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 and Qwen3.8 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max.

Which is better, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 or Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 28.1. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 compare to Qwen3.8 Max in benchmarks?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.8%, AIME 2025: 92.3%, WritingBench: 88.3%, IFEval: 87.8%, Creative Writing v3: 86.1%. Qwen3.8 Max scores PaperBench: 93.0%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 92.9%, GPQA: 92.6%, VideoMME w sub.: 90.4%, RealWorldQA: 88.0%.

Is Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 5.5x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs $0.30/M input and $3.00/M output via fireworks. Qwen3.8 Max costs $1.65/M input and $4.95/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 and Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports 262K tokens and Qwen3.8 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 and Qwen3.8 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (28.1 vs 51.9), context window (262K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.30 vs $1.65/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Qwen3.8-Max License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.