Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GLM-4.5V

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku and GLM-4.5V across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and GLM-4.5V don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.5V costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than GLM-4.5V ($0.55/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 1.8x more expensive than GLM-4.5V ($2.19/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than GLM-4.5V.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input tokens$0.80

Output tokens$4.00

Best providerAWS Bedrock

GLM-4.5V

Input tokens$0.55

Output tokens$2.19

Best providerFireworks

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GLM-4.5V's 131,072 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GLM-4.5V is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

GLM-4.5V

Input131,072 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GLM-4.5V supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

GLM-4.5V can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text

Images

Audio

Video

GLM-4.5V

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.5V uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.5V

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while GLM-4.5V was released on 2025-08-11.

GLM-4.5V is 10 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.6 years ago

GLM-4.5V

Aug 11, 2025

9 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. GLM-4.5V is available from Fireworks, Novita.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

GLM-4.5V

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Haiku

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

GLM-4.5V

View details

Zhipu AI

Supports multimodal inputs

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude 3.5 Haiku	GLM-4.5V

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GLM-4.5V.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or GLM-4.5V?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and GLM-4.5V (Zhipu AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to GLM-4.5V in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. GLM-4.5V costs $0.55/M input and $2.19/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and GLM-4.5V?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and GLM-4.5V supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and GLM-4.5V?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.80 vs $0.55/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and GLM-4.5V?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and GLM-4.5V is developed by Zhipu AI.