Model Comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs GLM-4.5

GLM-4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3 Haiku is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-4.5 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

GLM-4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than GLM-4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than GLM-4.5 ($1.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-4.5 is more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3 Haiku

Input tokens$0.25

Output tokens$1.25

Best providerAnthropic

GLM-4.5

Input tokens$0.40

Output tokens$1.60

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GLM-4.5's 131,072 tokens. Claude 3 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GLM-4.5 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Claude 3 Haiku

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

GLM-4.5

Input131,072 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.5 does not.

Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text

Images

Audio

Video

GLM-4.5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.5 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.5

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while GLM-4.5 was released on 2025-07-28.

GLM-4.5 is 17 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.2 years ago

GLM-4.5

Jul 28, 2025

9 months ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GLM-4.5 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Novita.

Claude 3 Haiku

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

GLM-4.5

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude 3 Haiku

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

GLM-4.5

View details

Zhipu AI

Has open weights

Higher GPQA score (79.1% vs 33.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude 3 Haiku	GLM-4.5

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs GLM-4.5.

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or GLM-4.5?

GLM-4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic and GLM-4.5 is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3 Haiku compare to GLM-4.5 in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%. GLM-4.5 scores MATH-500: 98.2%, AIME 2024: 91.0%, MMLU-Pro: 84.6%, TAU-bench Retail: 79.7%, GPQA: 79.1%.

Is Claude 3 Haiku cheaper than GLM-4.5?

Claude 3 Haiku is 1.6x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output via anthropic. GLM-4.5 costs $0.40/M input and $1.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Haiku and GLM-4.5?

Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and GLM-4.5 supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Haiku and GLM-4.5?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.40/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Haiku and GLM-4.5?

Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and GLM-4.5 is developed by Zhipu AI.