Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is 40.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemini 1.0 Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.0 Pro costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than Gemini 1.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Gemini 1.0 Pro ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.1 is more expensive than Gemini 1.0 Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.1 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro's 32,760 tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.0 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 1.0 Pro does not.

Claude Opus 4.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15.

Claude Opus 4.1 is 18 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

8 months ago

1.5yr newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.1

—

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.1 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemini 1.0 Pro is available from Google.

Claude Opus 4.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Gemini 1.0 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (80.9% vs 27.9%)
Google
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.1 is made by Anthropic and Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%, MMMU: 47.9%.
Gemini 1.0 Pro is 30.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. Gemini 1.0 Pro costs $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output via google.
Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens and Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 33K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.50/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google.