Command R+ vs GLM-4.5V Comparison

Comparing Command R+ and GLM-4.5V across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and GLM-4.5V don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.2x cheaper than GLM-4.5V ($0.55/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.2x cheaper than GLM-4.5V ($2.19/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-4.5V is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V
Input tokens$0.55
Output tokens$2.19
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

4.0B diff

GLM-4.5V has 4.0B more parameters than Command R+, making it 3.8% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V
108.0Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
108.0B
GLM-4.5V

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-4.5V accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. GLM-4.5V can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Command R+ is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GLM-4.5V supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

GLM-4.5V can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-4.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while GLM-4.5V uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

GLM-4.5V

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while GLM-4.5V was released on 2025-08-11.

GLM-4.5V is 12 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.5 years ago

GLM-4.5V

Aug 11, 2025

7 months ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. GLM-4.5V is available from Fireworks, Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

GLM-4.5V

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V