Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 is 7.2x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot Edit), while Gemini 2.5 Pro is better at 5 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot, AIME 2024, GPQA, SimpleQA, SWE-Bench Verified).

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 4.6x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($1.10/1M tokens) is 9.1x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$1.10
Best providerDeepSeek
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro is limited to 65,536 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3 does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while Gemini 2.5 Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25, while Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is 5 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.

DeepSeek-V3

Dec 25, 2024

1.4 years ago

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while DeepSeek-V3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V3

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3 is available from DeepSeek. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available from Google.

DeepSeek-V3

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.10/1M

Gemini 2.5 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher Aider-Polyglot Edit score (79.7% vs 72.7%)
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher Aider-Polyglot score (76.5% vs 49.6%)
Higher AIME 2024 score (92.0% vs 39.2%)
Higher GPQA score (83.0% vs 59.1%)
Higher SimpleQA score (50.8% vs 24.9%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (63.2% vs 42.0%)
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V3
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 is made by DeepSeek and Gemini 2.5 Pro is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3 compare to Gemini 2.5 Pro in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3 scores DROP: 91.6%, CLUEWSC: 90.9%, MATH-500: 90.2%, MMLU-Redux: 89.1%, MMLU: 88.5%. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores MRCR: 93.0%, AIME 2024: 92.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.6%, Video-MME: 84.8%, AIME 2025: 83.0%.

Is DeepSeek-V3 cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro?

DeepSeek-V3 is 4.6x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3 costs $0.27/M input and $1.10/M output via deepseek. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro?

DeepSeek-V3 supports 131K tokens and Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.27 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed) vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3 and Gemini 2.5 Pro?

DeepSeek-V3 is developed by DeepSeek and Gemini 2.5 Pro is developed by Google.