Model Comparison

DeepSeek VL2 vs Claude 3.7 SonnetWhich is better in 2026?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: DeepSeek VL2 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet — which is better?

DeepSeek VL2 (by DeepSeek) and Claude 3.7 Sonnet (by Anthropic) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

DeepSeek VL2 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU). Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose DeepSeek VL2 if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek VL2 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU).

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jul 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.7 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek VL2's 129,280 tokens. DeepSeek VL2 can generate longer responses up to 129,280 tokens, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Jul 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3.7 Sonnet support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 is licensed under deepseek, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 2 months newer than DeepSeek VL2.

DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.6 years ago

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.4 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek VL2 is available from Replicate. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.

DeepSeek VL2

replicate logo
Replicate

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Has open weights
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher MMMU score (75.0% vs 51.1%)
DeepSeekDeepSeek VL2
AnthropicClaude 3.7 Sonnet
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3.7 Sonnet side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek VL2
✓ Preferred
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 or Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek VL2 is made by DeepSeek and Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek VL2 compare to Claude 3.7 Sonnet in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens and Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Key differences include context window (129K vs 200K), licensing (deepseek vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 and Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek and Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic.

Related comparisons