Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GLM-4.5 Comparison

Comparing Gemini 2.5 Flash and GLM-4.5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while GLM-4.5 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified).

GLM-4.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.5 costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than GLM-4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Flash ($2.50/1M tokens) is 1.6x more expensive than GLM-4.5 ($1.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Flash is more expensive than GLM-4.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$1.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GLM-4.5's 131,072 tokens. GLM-4.5 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.5 does not.

Gemini 2.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.5 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.5

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20, while GLM-4.5 was released on 2025-07-28.

GLM-4.5 is 2 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

May 20, 2025

9 months ago

GLM-4.5

Jul 28, 2025

7 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while GLM-4.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-4.5's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jan 2025

GLM-4.5

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Flash is available from Google. GLM-4.5 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 2.5 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

GLM-4.5

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Higher GPQA score (82.8% vs 79.1%)
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2024 score (91.0% vs 88.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (14.4% vs 11.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (64.2% vs 60.4%)
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash
Zhipu AIGLM-4.5

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5