Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-4.6 Comparison

Comparing Gemini 2.5 Pro and GLM-4.6 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while GLM-4.6 is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, SWE-Bench Verified).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.6 costs less

For input processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25/1M tokens) is 2.3x more expensive than GLM-4.6 ($0.55/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 2.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than GLM-4.6 ($2.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro is more expensive than GLM-4.6.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6
Input tokens$0.55
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to GLM-4.6's 131,072 tokens. GLM-4.6 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemini 2.5 Pro and GLM-4.6 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 2.5 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.6 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.6

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20, while GLM-4.6 was released on 2025-09-30.

GLM-4.6 is 4 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

9 months ago

GLM-4.6

Sep 30, 2025

5 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while GLM-4.6's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-4.6's cutoff date.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

GLM-4.6

Provider Availability

Gemini 2.5 Pro is available from Google. GLM-4.6 is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

GLM-4.6

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (83.0% vs 81.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (17.8% vs 17.2%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (93.9% vs 83.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (68.0% vs 63.2%)
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Zhipu AIGLM-4.6

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6