Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs GLM-4.5-Air

GLM-4.5-Air significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-4.5-Air is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro).

GLM-4.5-Air significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue May 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

104.1B diff

GLM-4.5-Air has 104.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 5449.7% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air
106.0Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
106.0B
GLM-4.5-Air

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.5-Air does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-4.5-Air

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while GLM-4.5-Air uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

GLM-4.5-Air

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while GLM-4.5-Air was released on 2025-07-28.

GLM-4.5-Air is 2 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

GLM-4.5-Air

Jul 28, 2025

9 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while GLM-4.5-Air's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-4.5-Air's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

GLM-4.5-Air

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Zhipu AI
Higher GPQA score (75.0% vs 23.7%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (70.7% vs 13.2%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (81.4% vs 50.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs GLM-4.5-Air.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or GLM-4.5-Air?

GLM-4.5-Air significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and GLM-4.5-Air is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to GLM-4.5-Air in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. GLM-4.5-Air scores MATH-500: 98.1%, AIME 2024: 89.4%, MMLU-Pro: 81.4%, TAU-bench Retail: 77.9%, BFCL-v3: 76.4%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and GLM-4.5-Air?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and GLM-4.5-Air?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and GLM-4.5-Air is developed by Zhipu AI.