Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Grok-1.5

Grok-1.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed outperforms in 1 benchmarks (HumanEval), while Grok-1.5 is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Grok-1.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
xAI
Grok-1.5
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Apr 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok-1.5 does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 15 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

1.2yr newer
Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Grok-1.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-1.5's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Grok-1.5

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (32,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher HumanEval score (75.0% vs 74.1%)
xAI
Higher GPQA score (35.9% vs 23.7%)
Higher MMLU score (81.3% vs 64.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (51.0% vs 50.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
xAI
Grok-1.5

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Grok-1.5

Grok-1.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google and Grok-1.5 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%. Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens and Grok-1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google and Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI.