Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Grok-1.5V

Comparing Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Grok-1.5V across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Grok-1.5V don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-1.5V
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Grok-1.5V support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-1.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-1.5V

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Grok-1.5V was released on 2024-04-12.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 15 months newer than Grok-1.5V.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

1.2yr newer
Grok-1.5V

Apr 12, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Grok-1.5V's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-1.5V's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Grok-1.5V

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Larger context window (32,000 tokens)
xAI

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
xAI
Grok-1.5V

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Grok-1.5V.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or Grok-1.5V?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (Google) and Grok-1.5V (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed compare to Grok-1.5V in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%. Grok-1.5V scores AI2D: 88.3%, DocVQA: 85.6%, TextVQA: 78.1%, ChartQA: 76.1%, RealWorldQA: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Grok-1.5V?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens and Grok-1.5V supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Grok-1.5V?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google and Grok-1.5V is developed by xAI.