Model Comparison

o1 vs Jamba 1.5 Mini

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Jamba 1.5 Mini is 105.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

o1 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, GSM8k, MMLU), while Jamba 1.5 Mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Jamba 1.5 Mini costs less

For input processing, o1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 75.0x more expensive than Jamba 1.5 Mini ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, o1 ($60.00/1M tokens) is 150.0x more expensive than Jamba 1.5 Mini ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1 is more expensive than Jamba 1.5 Mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input tokens$15.00

Output tokens$60.00

Best providerAzure

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Input tokens$0.20

Output tokens$0.40

Best providerAWS Bedrock

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Jamba 1.5 Mini accepts 256,144 input tokens compared to o1's 200,000 tokens. Jamba 1.5 Mini can generate longer responses up to 256,144 tokens, while o1 is limited to 100,000 tokens.

Input200,000 tokens

Output100,000 tokens

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Input256,144 tokens

Output256,144 tokens

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Jamba 1.5 Mini uses Jamba Open Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Proprietary

Closed source

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1 was released on 2024-12-17, while Jamba 1.5 Mini was released on 2024-08-22.

o1 is 4 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Mini.

Dec 17, 2024

1.4 years ago

3mo newer

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Aug 22, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Jamba 1.5 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while o1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Mini's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1's cutoff date.

—

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Mar 2024

Provider Availability

o1 is available from Azure, OpenAI. Jamba 1.5 Mini is available from Bedrock, Google.

o1

Azure

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

OpenAI

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

Jamba 1.5 Mini

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

o1

View details

OpenAI

Higher GPQA score (78.0% vs 32.3%)

Higher GSM8k score (97.1% vs 75.8%)

Higher MMLU score (91.8% vs 69.7%)

Jamba 1.5 Mini

View details

AI21 Labs

Larger context window (256,144 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	o1	Jamba 1.5 Mini

FAQ

Common questions about o1 vs Jamba 1.5 Mini.

Which is better, o1 or Jamba 1.5 Mini?

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o1 is made by OpenAI and Jamba 1.5 Mini is made by AI21 Labs. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o1 compare to Jamba 1.5 Mini in benchmarks?

o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%. Jamba 1.5 Mini scores ARC-C: 85.7%, GSM8k: 75.8%, MMLU: 69.7%, TruthfulQA: 54.1%, Arena Hard: 46.1%.

Is o1 cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Jamba 1.5 Mini is 75.0x cheaper for input tokens. o1 costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure. Jamba 1.5 Mini costs $0.20/M input and $0.40/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for o1 and Jamba 1.5 Mini?

o1 supports 200K tokens and Jamba 1.5 Mini supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1 and Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 256K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Jamba Open Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1 and Jamba 1.5 Mini?

o1 is developed by OpenAI and Jamba 1.5 Mini is developed by AI21 Labs.