AA-LCR

Agent Arena Long Context Reasoning benchmark

Mistral Small 4 from Mistral AI currently leads the AA-LCR leaderboard with a score of 0.712 across 13 evaluated AI models.

Mistral AIMistral Small 4 leads with 71.2%, followed by Moonshot AIKimi K2.5 at 70.0% and Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-397B-A17B at 68.7%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on AA-LCR

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

AA-LCR Leaderboard

13 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
119B256K$0.15 / $0.60
2
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T262K$0.60 / $3.00
3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
397B262K$0.60 / $3.60
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.50 / $3.00
5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
122B262K$0.40 / $3.20
6
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
7
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
9B
8230B1.0M$0.30 / $1.20
9
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B262K$0.25 / $2.00
10120B
11
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
4B
12
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2B
13
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
800M
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about AA-LCR.

What is the AA-LCR benchmark?

Agent Arena Long Context Reasoning benchmark

What is the AA-LCR leaderboard?

The AA-LCR leaderboard ranks 13 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Mistral Small 4 by Mistral AI leads with a score of 0.712. The average score across all models is 0.569.

What is the highest AA-LCR score?

The highest AA-LCR score is 0.712, achieved by Mistral Small 4 from Mistral AI.

How many models are evaluated on AA-LCR?

13 models have been evaluated on the AA-LCR benchmark, with 0 verified results and 13 self-reported results.

What categories does AA-LCR cover?

AA-LCR is categorized under long context and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all long context
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models