SWE-Bench Verified
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on SWE-Bench Verified
SWE-Bench Verified Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $10.00 / $50.00 | ||
| 2 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 3 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 4 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 5 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $3.00 / $15.00 | ||
| 6 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 7 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 8 | Google | — | 1.0M | $2.50 / $15.00 | ||
| 8 | DeepSeek | 1.6T | 1.0M | $1.60 / $3.20 | ||
| 10 | MiniMax | — | 1.0M | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 11 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $1.25 / $3.75 | ||
| 12 | MiniMax | 230B | 1.0M | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 12 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | 262K | $0.75 / $3.50 | ||
| 14 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $1.75 / $14.00 | ||
| 15 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $3.00 / $15.00 | ||
| 16 | DeepSeek | 284B | 1.0M | $0.10 / $0.20 | ||
| 17 | Xiaomi | 1.0T | 1.0M | $0.43 / $0.87 | ||
| 18 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 19 | Google | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 19 | Xiaomi | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 21 | Zhipu AI | 744B | 200K | $1.00 / $3.20 | ||
| 22 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.32 / $1.28 | ||
| 23 | Mistral AI | 128B | 256K | $1.50 / $7.50 | ||
| 24 | Meta | — | — | — | ||
| 25 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28B | 262K | $0.60 / $3.60 | ||
| 26 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 27 | ByteDance | — | 256K | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 28 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 397B | — | — | ||
| 29 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $1.25 / $10.00 | ||
| 29 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $1.25 / $10.00 | ||
| 29 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 32 | Google | — | — | — | ||
| 33 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 34 | Xiaomi | — | — | — | ||
| 35 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 35 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 37 | StepFun | 196B | 66K | $0.10 / $0.40 | ||
| 38 | Zhipu AI | 358B | — | — | ||
| 39 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 40 | ByteDance | — | — | — | ||
| 40 | Microsoft | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 42 | Xiaomi | 309B | — | — | ||
| 42 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | — | — | ||
| 44 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $1.00 / $5.00 | ||
| 45 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 45 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 45 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 48 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 49 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 50 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 27B | 262K | $0.30 / $2.40 |
Sub-benchmarks
SWE-Bench Multimodal
SWE-Bench Multimodal extends SWE-Bench to evaluate language models on software engineering tasks that involve visual inputs such as screenshots, UI mockups, and diagrams alongside code understanding.
SWE-Bench Pro
SWE-Bench Pro is an advanced version of SWE-Bench that evaluates language models on complex, real-world software engineering tasks requiring extended reasoning and multi-step problem solving.
What is SWE-Bench Verified?
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
SWE-Bench Verified is a text benchmark evaluating models on reasoning, frontend development, and code tasks. LLM Stats tracks 103 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.7, with the leader at 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning, best AI for frontend development and best AI for code leaderboards.
Current leaders
Claude Fable 5 from Anthropic currently leads the SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard with a score of 0.950 across 103 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
- Authors
- Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, and 3 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2310.06770
Abstract
Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a language model is tasked with editing the codebase to address the issue. Resolving issues in SWE-bench frequently requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and even files simultaneously, calling for models to interact with execution environments, process extremely long contexts and perform complex reasoning that goes far beyond traditional code generation tasks. Our evaluations show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues. The best-performing model, Claude 2, is able to solve a mere $1.96$% of the issues. Advances on SWE-bench represent steps towards LMs that are more practical, intelligent, and autonomous.
FAQ
Common questions about the SWE-Bench Verified benchmark and leaderboard.