SWE-Bench Verified

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on SWE-Bench Verified

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

SWE-Bench Verified Leaderboard

103 models
ContextCostLicense
11.0M$10.00 / $50.00
2
31.0M$5.00 / $25.00
41.0M$5.00 / $25.00
51.0M$3.00 / $15.00
6
71.0M$5.00 / $25.00
81.0M$2.50 / $15.00
81.6T1.0M$1.60 / $3.20
10
MiniMax
MiniMax
1.0M$0.30 / $1.20
11
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$1.25 / $3.75
12230B1.0M$0.30 / $1.20
12
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T262K$0.75 / $3.50
14
OpenAI
OpenAI
400K$1.75 / $14.00
15200K$3.00 / $15.00
16284B1.0M$0.10 / $0.20
171.0T1.0M$0.43 / $0.87
18
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.50 / $3.00
191.0M$0.50 / $3.00
191.0T
21
Zhipu AI
Zhipu AI
744B200K$1.00 / $3.20
22
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.32 / $1.28
23128B256K$1.50 / $7.50
24
25
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
28B262K$0.60 / $3.60
26
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T
27
ByteDance
ByteDance
256K$0.50 / $3.00
28
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
397B
29
OpenAI
OpenAI
400K$1.25 / $10.00
29400K$1.25 / $10.00
29
32
33
OpenAI
OpenAI
34
35
35
37196B66K$0.10 / $0.40
38
Zhipu AI
Zhipu AI
358B
39
40
ByteDance
ByteDance
401.0T
42309B
42
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B
44200K$1.00 / $5.00
45685B
45685B
45685B
48
49
Anthropic
Anthropic
50
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
150 of 103
1/3
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Sub-benchmarks

About this benchmark

What is SWE-Bench Verified?

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

SWE-Bench Verified is a text benchmark evaluating models on reasoning, frontend development, and code tasks. LLM Stats tracks 103 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.7, with the leader at 0.9.

Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning, best AI for frontend development and best AI for code leaderboards.

Current leaders

Claude Fable 5 from Anthropic currently leads the SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard with a score of 0.950 across 103 evaluated AI models.

1Claude Fable 5Anthropic95.0%
2Claude Mythos PreviewAnthropic93.9%
3Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic88.6%
OSSDeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max#8 open-weight80.6%

Source paper

Title
SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
Authors
Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, and 3 others
Published
Abstract

Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a language model is tasked with editing the codebase to address the issue. Resolving issues in SWE-bench frequently requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and even files simultaneously, calling for models to interact with execution environments, process extremely long contexts and perform complex reasoning that goes far beyond traditional code generation tasks. Our evaluations show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues. The best-performing model, Claude 2, is able to solve a mere $1.96$% of the issues. Advances on SWE-bench represent steps towards LMs that are more practical, intelligent, and autonomous.

FAQ

Common questions about the SWE-Bench Verified benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the SWE-Bench Verified benchmark?

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

What is the SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard?

The SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard ranks 103 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic leads with a score of 0.950. The average score across all models is 0.663.

What is the highest SWE-Bench Verified score?

The highest SWE-Bench Verified score is 0.950, achieved by Claude Fable 5 from Anthropic.

How many models are evaluated on SWE-Bench Verified?

103 models have been evaluated on the SWE-Bench Verified benchmark, with 0 verified results and 103 self-reported results.

Where can I find the SWE-Bench Verified paper?

The SWE-Bench Verified paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06770. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does SWE-Bench Verified cover?

SWE-Bench Verified is categorized under reasoning, frontend development, and code. The benchmark evaluates text models.

Are there variants of SWE-Bench Verified?

Yes. SWE-Bench Verified has 2 related variants: SWE-Bench Multimodal, SWE-Bench Pro.

What is the best open-source model on SWE-Bench Verified?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max by DeepSeek is the top-ranked open-source model on SWE-Bench Verified, with a score of 0.806 (rank #8).

Which model offers the best value on SWE-Bench Verified?

Among models scoring within 10% of the leader, Claude Opus 4.8 from Anthropic is the cheapest, at $5.00 per million input tokens with a score of 0.886.

How is SWE-Bench Verified scored?

SWE-Bench Verified is scored using accuracy, reported on a 0–1 scale. Lower is better only when explicitly noted; on this leaderboard, higher scores indicate better performance.

How recent are the SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard results?

The SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard was last updated in July 2026 and currently includes 103 evaluated models.