SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

Claude Mythos Preview from Anthropic currently leads the SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard with a score of 0.939 across 90 evaluated AI models.

Paper

AnthropicClaude Mythos Preview leads with 93.9%, followed by AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 at 87.6% and AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5 at 80.9%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on SWE-Bench Verified

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

SWE-Bench Verified Leaderboard

90 models
ContextCostLicense
1
21.0M$5.00 / $25.00
3
41.0M$5.00 / $25.00
51.0M$2.50 / $15.00
51.6T1.0M$1.74 / $3.48
7230B1.0M$0.30 / $1.20
7
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T262K$0.95 / $4.00
9
OpenAI
OpenAI
400K$1.75 / $14.00
10200K$3.00 / $15.00
11284B1.0M$0.14 / $0.28
12
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.50 / $3.00
131.0M$0.50 / $3.00
131.0T
15
Zhipu AI
Zhipu AI
744B200K$1.00 / $3.20
16128B256K$1.50 / $7.50
17
18
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
28B262K$0.60 / $3.60
19
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T
20
ByteDance
ByteDance
21
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
397B262K$0.60 / $3.60
22400K$1.25 / $10.00
22
OpenAI
OpenAI
400K$1.25 / $10.00
22
25
26
OpenAI
OpenAI
27
28
28
30196B66K$0.10 / $0.40
31
Zhipu AI
Zhipu AI
358B
32
33
ByteDance
ByteDance
34
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B
34309B
36200K$1.00 / $5.00
37685B
37685B
37685B
40
41
Anthropic
Anthropic
42
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
43
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
122B262K$0.40 / $3.20
441.0T
45256K$0.20 / $1.50
46
47560B
48
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
480B
48
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0T
50
MiniMax
MiniMax
230B1.0M$0.30 / $1.20
150 of 90
1/2
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about SWE-Bench Verified.

What is the SWE-Bench Verified benchmark?

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

What is the SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard?

The SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard ranks 90 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Claude Mythos Preview by Anthropic leads with a score of 0.939. The average score across all models is 0.647.

What is the highest SWE-Bench Verified score?

The highest SWE-Bench Verified score is 0.939, achieved by Claude Mythos Preview from Anthropic.

How many models are evaluated on SWE-Bench Verified?

90 models have been evaluated on the SWE-Bench Verified benchmark, with 0 verified results and 90 self-reported results.

Where can I find the SWE-Bench Verified paper?

The SWE-Bench Verified paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06770. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does SWE-Bench Verified cover?

SWE-Bench Verified is categorized under code, frontend development, and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

Sub-benchmarks

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all code
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
75 models
LiveCodeBench

LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.

code
71 models