LiveCodeBench
LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max from DeepSeek currently leads the LiveCodeBench leaderboard with a score of 0.935 across 71 evaluated AI models.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max leads with 93.5%, followed by
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max at 91.6% and
DeepSeek-V3.2 at 83.3%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on LiveCodeBench
LiveCodeBench Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek | 1.6T | 1.0M | $1.74 / $3.48 | ||
| 2 | DeepSeek | 284B | 1.0M | $0.14 / $0.28 | ||
| 3 | DeepSeek | 685B | 164K | $0.26 / $0.38 | ||
| 3 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 5 | MiniMax | 230B | 1.0M | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 6 | Meituan | 560B | 128K | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 7 | 120B | — | — | |||
| 8 | xAI | — | 128K | $0.30 / $0.50 | ||
| 9 | xAI | — | 2.0M | $0.20 / $0.50 | ||
| 10 | xAI | — | 128K | $3.00 / $15.00 | ||
| 10 | xAI | — | — | — | ||
| 10 | Meituan | 560B | — | — | ||
| 13 | xAI | — | — | — | ||
| 14 | MiniMax | 230B | 1.0M | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 15 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 16 | DeepSeek | 671B | 131K | $0.55 / $2.19 | ||
| 17 | Zhipu AI | 355B | — | — | ||
| 18 | NVIDIA | 9B | — | — | ||
| 19 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 235B | — | — | ||
| 19 | Zhipu AI | 106B | — | — | ||
| 21 | — | — | — | |||
| 22 | Inception | — | 128K | $0.25 / $0.75 | ||
| 23 | 253B | — | — | |||
| 24 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | 128K | $0.10 / $0.44 | ||
| 25 | MiniMax | 456B | — | — | ||
| 26 | Mistral AI | 14B | — | — | ||
| 27 | Mistral AI | 119B | 256K | $0.15 / $0.60 | ||
| 28 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 29 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | 128K | $0.10 / $0.44 | ||
| 30 | MiniMax | 456B | — | — | ||
| 31 | Mistral AI | 8B | — | — | ||
| 32 | DeepSeek | 71B | — | — | ||
| 33 | DeepSeek | 33B | — | — | ||
| 34 | DeepSeek | 671B | 164K | $0.27 / $1.00 | ||
| 35 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 73B | — | — | ||
| 36 | Mistral AI | 3B | — | — | ||
| 37 | Microsoft | 14B | — | — | ||
| 38 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 39 | Microsoft | 14B | — | — | ||
| 39 | DeepSeek | 15B | — | — | ||
| 41 | Mistral AI | 24B | — | — | ||
| 42 | Mistral AI | 24B | — | — | ||
| 43 | DeepSeek | 671B | — | — | ||
| 43 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 45 | DeepSeek | 671B | 164K | $0.28 / $1.14 | ||
| 46 | Meituan | 560B | 128K | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 47 | Meta | 400B | — | — | ||
| 48 | DeepSeek | 8B | — | — | ||
| 49 | DeepSeek | 671B | — | — | ||
| 49 | DeepSeek | 8B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about LiveCodeBench.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions