MMLU-Pro
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MMLU-Pro
MMLU-Pro Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $1.25 / $3.75 | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.32 / $1.28 | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 4 | MiniMax | 230B | 1.0M | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 397B | — | — | ||
| 6 | DeepSeek | 1.6T | 1.0M | $1.60 / $3.20 | ||
| 7 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 8 | Baidu | — | — | — | ||
| 9 | 550B | — | — | |||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 122B | — | — | ||
| 11 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28B | 262K | $0.60 / $3.60 | ||
| 11 | DeepSeek | 284B | 1.0M | $0.10 / $0.20 | ||
| 13 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 27B | 262K | $0.30 / $2.40 | ||
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | — | — | ||
| 15 | Google | 31B | 262K | $0.13 / $0.38 | ||
| 15 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | — | — | ||
| 17 | Microsoft | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 17 | DeepSeek | 671B | — | — | ||
| 17 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 17 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 17 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 22 | Xiaomi | 309B | — | — | ||
| 23 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 23 | Zhipu AI | 355B | — | — | ||
| 25 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 235B | — | — | ||
| 26 | Zhipu AI | 358B | — | — | ||
| 27 | LG AI Research | 236B | — | — | ||
| 27 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 29 | 120B | — | — | |||
| 30 | DeepSeek | 671B | — | — | ||
| 31 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 235B | — | — | ||
| 32 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 80B | — | — | ||
| 33 | Meituan | 560B | — | — | ||
| 34 | Google | 25B | 262K | $0.13 / $0.40 | ||
| 34 | Meituan | 560B | — | — | ||
| 36 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 36 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | — | — | ||
| 38 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 39 | MiniMax | 230B | 1.0M | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 40 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 41 | Sarvam AI | 105B | — | — | ||
| 42 | Amazon | — | — | — | ||
| 43 | Zhipu AI | 106B | — | — | ||
| 44 | DeepSeek | 671B | — | — | ||
| 45 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 45 | MiniMax | 456B | — | — | ||
| 45 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 48 | Amazon | — | 1.0M | $0.30 / $2.50 | ||
| 49 | OpenAI | 117B | — | — | ||
| 49 | Amazon | — | — | — |
What is MMLU-Pro?
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
MMLU-Pro is a text benchmark evaluating models on math, reasoning, language, legal, finance, general, and healthcare tasks. LLM Stats tracks 129 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.7, with the leader at 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for math, best AI for reasoning, best AI for language, best AI for legal, best AI for finance, best AI for general and best AI for healthcare leaderboards.
Current leaders
Qwen3.7 Max from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the MMLU-Pro leaderboard with a score of 0.896 across 129 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark
- Authors
- Yubo Wang, Xueguang Ma, Ge Zhang, Yuansheng Ni, and 13 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2406.01574
Abstract
In the age of large-scale language models, benchmarks like the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) have been pivotal in pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve in language comprehension and reasoning across diverse domains. However, as models continue to improve, their performance on these benchmarks has begun to plateau, making it increasingly difficult to discern differences in model capabilities. This paper introduces MMLU-Pro, an enhanced dataset designed to extend the mostly knowledge-driven MMLU benchmark by integrating more challenging, reasoning-focused questions and expanding the choice set from four to ten options. Additionally, MMLU-Pro eliminates the trivial and noisy questions in MMLU. Our experimental results show that MMLU-Pro not only raises the challenge, causing a significant drop in accuracy by 16% to 33% compared to MMLU but also demonstrates greater stability under varying prompts. With 24 different prompt styles tested, the sensitivity of model scores to prompt variations decreased from 4-5% in MMLU to just 2% in MMLU-Pro. Additionally, we found that models utilizing Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning achieved better performance on MMLU-Pro compared to direct answering, which is in stark contrast to the findings on the original MMLU, indicating that MMLU-Pro includes more complex reasoning questions. Our assessments confirm that MMLU-Pro is a more discriminative benchmark to better track progress in the field.
FAQ
Common questions about the MMLU-Pro benchmark and leaderboard.