Arena Hard
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Arena Hard
Arena Hard Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 235B | — | — | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | 128K | $0.10 / $0.30 | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | 128K | $0.10 / $0.30 | ||
| 4 | 50B | — | — | |||
| 5 | Mistral AI | 24B | — | — | ||
| 6 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 73B | — | — | ||
| 7 | Microsoft | 14B | — | — | ||
| 8 | DeepSeek | 236B | — | — | ||
| 9 | Microsoft | 15B | — | — | ||
| 10 | Microsoft | 14B | — | — | ||
| 11 | Mistral AI | 8B | — | — | ||
| 12 | AI21 Labs | 398B | — | — | ||
| 13 | Mistral AI | 119B | 256K | $0.15 / $0.60 | ||
| 14 | 8B | — | — | |||
| 14 | 8B | — | — | |||
| 16 | Mistral AI | 14B | — | — | ||
| 16 | Mistral AI | 675B | — | — | ||
| 18 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 8B | — | — | ||
| 19 | Mistral AI | 8B | — | — | ||
| 20 | AI21 Labs | 52B | — | — | ||
| 21 | Mistral AI | 24B | — | — | ||
| 22 | Microsoft | 60B | — | — | ||
| 23 | Microsoft | 4B | — | — | ||
| 24 | Microsoft | 4B | — | — | ||
| 25 | Mistral AI | 3B | — | — | ||
| 26 | 7B | — | — |
What is Arena Hard?
Arena-Hard-Auto is an automatic evaluation benchmark for instruction-tuned LLMs consisting of 500 challenging real-world prompts curated by BenchBuilder. It includes open-ended software engineering problems, mathematical questions, and creative writing tasks. The benchmark uses LLM-as-a-Judge methodology with GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5 as automatic judges to approximate human preference. Arena-Hard achieves 98.6% correlation with human preference rankings and provides 3x higher separation of model performances compared to MT-Bench, making it highly effective for distinguishing between models of similar quality.
Arena Hard is a text benchmark evaluating models on reasoning, general, creativity, and writing tasks. LLM Stats tracks 26 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.6, with the leader at 1.0.
Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning, best AI for general, best AI for creativity and best AI for writing leaderboards.
Current leaders
Qwen3 235B A22B from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the Arena Hard leaderboard with a score of 0.956 across 26 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline
- Authors
- Tianle Li, Wei-Lin Chiang, Evan Frick, Lisa Dunlap, and 4 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2406.11939
Abstract
The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has outpaced the development of model evaluation, highlighting the need for continuous curation of new, challenging benchmarks. However, manual curation of high-quality, human-aligned benchmarks is expensive and time-consuming. To address this, we introduce BenchBuilder, an automated pipeline that leverages LLMs to curate high-quality, open-ended prompts from large, crowd-sourced datasets, enabling continuous benchmark updates without human in the loop. We apply BenchBuilder to datasets such as Chatbot Arena and WildChat-1M, extracting challenging prompts and utilizing LLM-as-a-Judge for automatic model evaluation. To validate benchmark quality, we propose new metrics to measure a benchmark's alignment with human preferences and ability to separate models. We release Arena-Hard-Auto, a benchmark consisting 500 challenging prompts curated by BenchBuilder. Arena-Hard-Auto provides 3x higher separation of model performances compared to MT-Bench and achieves 98.6% correlation with human preference rankings, all at a cost of $20. Our work sets a new framework for the scalable curation of automated benchmarks from extensive data.
FAQ
Common questions about the Arena Hard benchmark and leaderboard.