Arena-Hard v2
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Arena-Hard v2
Arena-Hard v2 Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xiaomi | 309B | — | — | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 80B | — | — | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 235B | — | — | ||
| 4 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 235B | — | — | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 6 | 120B | — | — | |||
| 7 | Sarvam AI | 105B | — | — | ||
| 8 | 32B | 262K | $0.06 / $0.24 | |||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 80B | — | — | ||
| 11 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 13 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | — | — | ||
| 15 | Sarvam AI | 30B | — | — | ||
| 16 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $1.00 |
What is Arena-Hard v2?
Arena-Hard-Auto v2 is a challenging benchmark consisting of 500 carefully curated prompts sourced from Chatbot Arena and WildChat-1M, designed to evaluate large language models on real-world user queries. The benchmark covers diverse domains including open-ended software engineering problems, mathematics, creative writing, and technical problem-solving. It uses LLM-as-a-Judge for automatic evaluation, achieving 98.6% correlation with human preference rankings while providing 3x higher separation of model performances compared to MT-Bench. The benchmark emphasizes prompt specificity, complexity, and domain knowledge to better distinguish between model capabilities.
Arena-Hard v2 is a text benchmark evaluating models on reasoning, general, creativity, and writing tasks. LLM Stats tracks 16 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.7, with the leader at 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning, best AI for general, best AI for creativity and best AI for writing leaderboards.
Current leaders
MiMo-V2-Flash from Xiaomi currently leads the Arena-Hard v2 leaderboard with a score of 0.862 across 16 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline
- Authors
- Tianle Li, Wei-Lin Chiang, Evan Frick, Lisa Dunlap, and 4 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2406.11939
Abstract
The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has outpaced the development of model evaluation, highlighting the need for continuous curation of new, challenging benchmarks. However, manual curation of high-quality, human-aligned benchmarks is expensive and time-consuming. To address this, we introduce BenchBuilder, an automated pipeline that leverages LLMs to curate high-quality, open-ended prompts from large, crowd-sourced datasets, enabling continuous benchmark updates without human in the loop. We apply BenchBuilder to datasets such as Chatbot Arena and WildChat-1M, extracting challenging prompts and utilizing LLM-as-a-Judge for automatic model evaluation. To validate benchmark quality, we propose new metrics to measure a benchmark's alignment with human preferences and ability to separate models. We release Arena-Hard-Auto, a benchmark consisting 500 challenging prompts curated by BenchBuilder. Arena-Hard-Auto provides 3x higher separation of model performances compared to MT-Bench and achieves 98.6% correlation with human preference rankings, all at a cost of $20. Our work sets a new framework for the scalable curation of automated benchmarks from extensive data.
FAQ
Common questions about the Arena-Hard v2 benchmark and leaderboard.