The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Arena-Hard v2

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Arena-Hard v2

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

Arena-Hard v2 Leaderboard

19 models
ContextCostLicense
1309B
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
80B262K$0.09 / $1.10
3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
235B
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
235B262K$0.09 / $0.55
5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
236B262K$0.20 / $0.88
6120B262K$0.09 / $0.40
7
Sarvam AI
Sarvam AI
105B
830B131K$0.16 / $0.65
932B262K$0.05 / $0.20
108B131K$0.06 / $0.25
11
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
33B
12
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
80B
13
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
33B
14
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
31B262K$0.15 / $0.60
15
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
31B
16
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
9B
17
Sarvam AI
Sarvam AI
30B
18
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
4B
193B131K$0.03 / $0.12
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is Arena-Hard v2?

Arena-Hard-Auto v2 is a challenging benchmark consisting of 500 carefully curated prompts sourced from Chatbot Arena and WildChat-1M, designed to evaluate large language models on real-world user queries. The benchmark covers diverse domains including open-ended software engineering problems, mathematics, creative writing, and technical problem-solving. It uses LLM-as-a-Judge for automatic evaluation, achieving 98.6% correlation with human preference rankings while providing 3x higher separation of model performances compared to MT-Bench. The benchmark emphasizes prompt specificity, complexity, and domain knowledge to better distinguish between model capabilities.

Arena-Hard v2 is a text benchmark evaluating models on reasoning, general, creativity, and writing tasks. LLM Stats tracks 19 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.6, with the leader at 0.9.

Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning, best AI for general, best AI for creativity and best AI for writing leaderboards.

Current leaders

MiMo-V2-Flash from Xiaomi currently leads the Arena-Hard v2 leaderboard with a score of 0.862 across 19 evaluated AI models.

1MiMo-V2-FlashXiaomi86.2%
2Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team82.7%
3Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team79.7%

Source paper

Title
From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline
Authors
Tianle Li, Wei-Lin Chiang, Evan Frick, Lisa Dunlap, and 4 others
Published
Abstract

The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has outpaced the development of model evaluation, highlighting the need for continuous curation of new, challenging benchmarks. However, manual curation of high-quality, human-aligned benchmarks is expensive and time-consuming. To address this, we introduce BenchBuilder, an automated pipeline that leverages LLMs to curate high-quality, open-ended prompts from large, crowd-sourced datasets, enabling continuous benchmark updates without human in the loop. We apply BenchBuilder to datasets such as Chatbot Arena and WildChat-1M, extracting challenging prompts and utilizing LLM-as-a-Judge for automatic model evaluation. To validate benchmark quality, we propose new metrics to measure a benchmark's alignment with human preferences and ability to separate models. We release Arena-Hard-Auto, a benchmark consisting 500 challenging prompts curated by BenchBuilder. Arena-Hard-Auto provides 3x higher separation of model performances compared to MT-Bench and achieves 98.6% correlation with human preference rankings, all at a cost of $20. Our work sets a new framework for the scalable curation of automated benchmarks from extensive data.

FAQ

Common questions about the Arena-Hard v2 benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the Arena-Hard v2 benchmark?

Arena-Hard-Auto v2 is a challenging benchmark consisting of 500 carefully curated prompts sourced from Chatbot Arena and WildChat-1M, designed to evaluate large language models on real-world user queries. The benchmark covers diverse domains including open-ended software engineering problems, mathematics, creative writing, and technical problem-solving. It uses LLM-as-a-Judge for automatic evaluation, achieving 98.6% correlation with human preference rankings while providing 3x higher separation of model performances compared to MT-Bench. The benchmark emphasizes prompt specificity, complexity, and domain knowledge to better distinguish between model capabilities.

What is the Arena-Hard v2 leaderboard?

The Arena-Hard v2 leaderboard ranks 19 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, MiMo-V2-Flash by Xiaomi leads with a score of 0.862. The average score across all models is 0.645.

What is the highest Arena-Hard v2 score?

The highest Arena-Hard v2 score is 0.862, achieved by MiMo-V2-Flash from Xiaomi.

How many models are evaluated on Arena-Hard v2?

19 models have been evaluated on the Arena-Hard v2 benchmark, with 0 verified results and 19 self-reported results.

Where can I find the Arena-Hard v2 paper?

The Arena-Hard v2 paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11939. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does Arena-Hard v2 cover?

Arena-Hard v2 is categorized under reasoning, general, creativity, and writing. The benchmark evaluates text models.

What is the best open-source model on Arena-Hard v2?

MiMo-V2-Flash by Xiaomi is the top-ranked open-source model on Arena-Hard v2, with a score of 0.862 (rank #1).

Which model offers the best value on Arena-Hard v2?

Among models scoring within 10% of the leader, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team is the cheapest, at $0.09 per million input tokens with a score of 0.827.

How recent are the Arena-Hard v2 leaderboard results?

The Arena-Hard v2 leaderboard was last updated in September 2026 and currently includes 19 evaluated models.