AutoLogi

AutoLogi is an automated method for synthesizing open-ended logic puzzles to evaluate reasoning abilities of Large Language Models. The benchmark addresses limitations of existing multiple-choice reasoning evaluations by featuring program-based verification and controllable difficulty levels. It includes 1,575 English and 883 Chinese puzzles, enabling more reliable evaluation that better distinguishes models' reasoning capabilities across languages.

Kimi K2 Instruct from Moonshot AI currently leads the AutoLogi leaderboard with a score of 0.895 across 2 evaluated AI models.

Paper

Moonshot AIKimi K2 Instruct leads with 89.5%, followed by Moonshot AIKimi K2-Instruct-0905 at 89.5%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on AutoLogi

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

AutoLogi Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T
11.0T
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about AutoLogi.

What is the AutoLogi benchmark?

AutoLogi is an automated method for synthesizing open-ended logic puzzles to evaluate reasoning abilities of Large Language Models. The benchmark addresses limitations of existing multiple-choice reasoning evaluations by featuring program-based verification and controllable difficulty levels. It includes 1,575 English and 883 Chinese puzzles, enabling more reliable evaluation that better distinguishes models' reasoning capabilities across languages.

What is the AutoLogi leaderboard?

The AutoLogi leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Kimi K2 Instruct by Moonshot AI leads with a score of 0.895. The average score across all models is 0.895.

What is the highest AutoLogi score?

The highest AutoLogi score is 0.895, achieved by Kimi K2 Instruct from Moonshot AI.

How many models are evaluated on AutoLogi?

2 models have been evaluated on the AutoLogi benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the AutoLogi paper?

The AutoLogi paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16906. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does AutoLogi cover?

AutoLogi is categorized under reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models with multilingual support.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all reasoning
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
90 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
75 models