BFCL v2

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) v2 is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' function calling capabilities. It features 2,251 question-function-answer pairs with enterprise and OSS-contributed functions, addressing data contamination and bias through live, user-contributed scenarios. The benchmark evaluates AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript) and includes complex real-world function calling scenarios with multi-lingual prompts.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct from Meta currently leads the BFCL v2 leaderboard with a score of 0.773 across 5 evaluated AI models.

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on BFCL v2

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

BFCL v2 Leaderboard

5 models
ContextCostLicense
170B
2253B
350B
43B
58B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about BFCL v2.

What is the BFCL v2 benchmark?

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) v2 is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' function calling capabilities. It features 2,251 question-function-answer pairs with enterprise and OSS-contributed functions, addressing data contamination and bias through live, user-contributed scenarios. The benchmark evaluates AST accuracy, executable accuracy, irrelevance detection, and relevance detection across multiple programming languages (Python, Java, JavaScript) and includes complex real-world function calling scenarios with multi-lingual prompts.

What is the BFCL v2 leaderboard?

The BFCL v2 leaderboard ranks 5 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct by Meta leads with a score of 0.773. The average score across all models is 0.711.

What is the highest BFCL v2 score?

The highest BFCL v2 score is 0.773, achieved by Llama 3.3 70B Instruct from Meta.

How many models are evaluated on BFCL v2?

5 models have been evaluated on the BFCL v2 benchmark, with 0 verified results and 5 self-reported results.

Where can I find the BFCL v2 paper?

The BFCL v2 paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15334. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does BFCL v2 cover?

BFCL v2 is categorized under tool calling, general, and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models with multilingual support.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all tool calling
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

general
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

general
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
90 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
75 models