BFCL_v3_MultiTurn
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V3 MultiTurn benchmark that evaluates large language models' ability to handle multi-turn and multi-step function calling scenarios. The benchmark introduces complex interactions requiring models to manage sequential function calls, handle conversational context across multiple turns, and make dynamic decisions about when and how to use available functions. BFCL V3 uses state-based evaluation by verifying the actual state of API systems after function execution, providing more realistic assessment of function calling capabilities in agentic applications.
MiniMax M2.5 from MiniMax currently leads the BFCL_v3_MultiTurn leaderboard with a score of 0.768 across 2 evaluated AI models.
MiniMax M2.5 leads with 76.8%, followed by Nemotron Nano 9B v2 at 66.9%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on BFCL_v3_MultiTurn
BFCL_v3_MultiTurn Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MiniMax | 230B | 1.0M | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 2 | NVIDIA | 9B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about BFCL_v3_MultiTurn.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions