BFCL_v3_MultiTurn

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V3 MultiTurn benchmark that evaluates large language models' ability to handle multi-turn and multi-step function calling scenarios. The benchmark introduces complex interactions requiring models to manage sequential function calls, handle conversational context across multiple turns, and make dynamic decisions about when and how to use available functions. BFCL V3 uses state-based evaluation by verifying the actual state of API systems after function execution, providing more realistic assessment of function calling capabilities in agentic applications.

MiniMax M2.5 from MiniMax currently leads the BFCL_v3_MultiTurn leaderboard with a score of 0.768 across 2 evaluated AI models.

Paper

MiniMaxMiniMax M2.5 leads with 76.8%, followed by NVIDIANemotron Nano 9B v2 at 66.9%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on BFCL_v3_MultiTurn

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

BFCL_v3_MultiTurn Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
1230B1.0M$0.30 / $1.20
29B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about BFCL_v3_MultiTurn.

What is the BFCL_v3_MultiTurn benchmark?

Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V3 MultiTurn benchmark that evaluates large language models' ability to handle multi-turn and multi-step function calling scenarios. The benchmark introduces complex interactions requiring models to manage sequential function calls, handle conversational context across multiple turns, and make dynamic decisions about when and how to use available functions. BFCL V3 uses state-based evaluation by verifying the actual state of API systems after function execution, providing more realistic assessment of function calling capabilities in agentic applications.

What is the BFCL_v3_MultiTurn leaderboard?

The BFCL_v3_MultiTurn leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, MiniMax M2.5 by MiniMax leads with a score of 0.768. The average score across all models is 0.719.

What is the highest BFCL_v3_MultiTurn score?

The highest BFCL_v3_MultiTurn score is 0.768, achieved by MiniMax M2.5 from MiniMax.

How many models are evaluated on BFCL_v3_MultiTurn?

2 models have been evaluated on the BFCL_v3_MultiTurn benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the BFCL_v3_MultiTurn paper?

The BFCL_v3_MultiTurn paper is available at https://openreview.net/forum?id=2GmDdhBdDk. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does BFCL_v3_MultiTurn cover?

BFCL_v3_MultiTurn is categorized under tool calling, general, and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all tool calling
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

general
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

general
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
90 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
75 models