CBNSL

Curriculum Learning of Bayesian Network Structures (CBNSL) benchmark for evaluating algorithms that learn Bayesian network structures from data using curriculum learning techniques. The benchmark uses networks from the bnlearn repository and evaluates structure learning performance using BDeu scoring metrics.

Kimi K2 Instruct from Moonshot AI currently leads the CBNSL leaderboard with a score of 0.956 across 1 evaluated AI models.

Paper

Moonshot AIKimi K2 Instruct leads with 95.6%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on CBNSL

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

CBNSL Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T200K$0.50 / $0.50
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about CBNSL.

What is the CBNSL benchmark?

Curriculum Learning of Bayesian Network Structures (CBNSL) benchmark for evaluating algorithms that learn Bayesian network structures from data using curriculum learning techniques. The benchmark uses networks from the bnlearn repository and evaluates structure learning performance using BDeu scoring metrics.

What is the CBNSL leaderboard?

The CBNSL leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Kimi K2 Instruct by Moonshot AI leads with a score of 0.956. The average score across all models is 0.956.

What is the highest CBNSL score?

The highest CBNSL score is 0.956, achieved by Kimi K2 Instruct from Moonshot AI.

How many models are evaluated on CBNSL?

1 models have been evaluated on the CBNSL benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

Where can I find the CBNSL paper?

The CBNSL paper is available at http://proceedings.mlr.press/v45/Zhao15a.pdf. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does CBNSL cover?

CBNSL is categorized under math and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all math
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

math
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

math
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

math
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

mathmultimodal
74 models