CloningScenarios

CloningScenarios is an expert-level multi-step reasoning benchmark about difficult genetic cloning scenarios in multiple-choice format. It evaluates dual-use biological knowledge relevant to bioweapons development.

Grok-4.1 Thinking from xAI currently leads the CloningScenarios leaderboard with a score of 0.460 across 1 evaluated AI models.

Paper

xAIGrok-4.1 Thinking leads with 46.0%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on CloningScenarios

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

CloningScenarios Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1256K$3.00 / $15.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about CloningScenarios.

What is the CloningScenarios benchmark?

CloningScenarios is an expert-level multi-step reasoning benchmark about difficult genetic cloning scenarios in multiple-choice format. It evaluates dual-use biological knowledge relevant to bioweapons development.

What is the CloningScenarios leaderboard?

The CloningScenarios leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Grok-4.1 Thinking by xAI leads with a score of 0.460. The average score across all models is 0.460.

What is the highest CloningScenarios score?

The highest CloningScenarios score is 0.460, achieved by Grok-4.1 Thinking from xAI.

How many models are evaluated on CloningScenarios?

1 models have been evaluated on the CloningScenarios benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

Where can I find the CloningScenarios paper?

The CloningScenarios paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10362. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does CloningScenarios cover?

CloningScenarios is categorized under healthcare, reasoning, and safety. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all healthcare
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

healthcare
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

healthcare
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models