CLUEWSC
CLUEWSC2020 is the Chinese version of the Winograd Schema Challenge, part of the CLUE benchmark. It focuses on pronoun disambiguation and coreference resolution, requiring models to determine which noun a pronoun refers to in a sentence. The dataset contains 1,244 training samples and 304 development samples extracted from contemporary Chinese literature.
Kimi-k1.5 from Moonshot AI currently leads the CLUEWSC leaderboard with a score of 0.914 across 3 evaluated AI models.
What CLUEWSC measures
CLUEWSC is a text benchmark that evaluates large language models on language and reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 3 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.8, with the leader reaching 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for language and best AI for reasoning leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- CLUE: A Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark
- Authors
- Liang Xu, Hai Hu, Xuanwei Zhang, Lu Li, and 28 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2004.05986
Abstract
The advent of natural language understanding (NLU) benchmarks for English, such as GLUE and SuperGLUE allows new NLU models to be evaluated across a diverse set of tasks. These comprehensive benchmarks have facilitated a broad range of research and applications in natural language processing (NLP). The problem, however, is that most such benchmarks are limited to English, which has made it difficult to replicate many of the successes in English NLU for other languages. To help remedy this issue, we introduce the first large-scale Chinese Language Understanding Evaluation (CLUE) benchmark. CLUE is an open-ended, community-driven project that brings together 9 tasks spanning several well-established single-sentence/sentence-pair classification tasks, as well as machine reading comprehension, all on original Chinese text. To establish results on these tasks, we report scores using an exhaustive set of current state-of-the-art pre-trained Chinese models (9 in total). We also introduce a number of supplementary datasets and additional tools to help facilitate further progress on Chinese NLU. Our benchmark is released at https://www.CLUEbenchmarks.com
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 91.4%, followed by 
DeepSeek-V3 at 90.9% and 
ERNIE 4.5 at 48.6%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on CLUEWSC
CLUEWSC Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moonshot AI | — | — | — | ||
| 2 | DeepSeek | 671B | — | — | ||
| 3 | Baidu | 21B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about CLUEWSC.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions