CLUEWSC

CLUEWSC2020 is the Chinese version of the Winograd Schema Challenge, part of the CLUE benchmark. It focuses on pronoun disambiguation and coreference resolution, requiring models to determine which noun a pronoun refers to in a sentence. The dataset contains 1,244 training samples and 304 development samples extracted from contemporary Chinese literature.

Kimi-k1.5 from Moonshot AI currently leads the CLUEWSC leaderboard with a score of 0.914 across 3 evaluated AI models.

Paper

Moonshot AIKimi-k1.5 leads with 91.4%, followed by DeepSeekDeepSeek-V3 at 90.9% and BaiduERNIE 4.5 at 48.6%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on CLUEWSC

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

CLUEWSC Leaderboard

3 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
2
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
671B131K$0.27 / $1.10
321B128K$0.40 / $4.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about CLUEWSC.

What is the CLUEWSC benchmark?

CLUEWSC2020 is the Chinese version of the Winograd Schema Challenge, part of the CLUE benchmark. It focuses on pronoun disambiguation and coreference resolution, requiring models to determine which noun a pronoun refers to in a sentence. The dataset contains 1,244 training samples and 304 development samples extracted from contemporary Chinese literature.

What is the CLUEWSC leaderboard?

The CLUEWSC leaderboard ranks 3 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Kimi-k1.5 by Moonshot AI leads with a score of 0.914. The average score across all models is 0.770.

What is the highest CLUEWSC score?

The highest CLUEWSC score is 0.914, achieved by Kimi-k1.5 from Moonshot AI.

How many models are evaluated on CLUEWSC?

3 models have been evaluated on the CLUEWSC benchmark, with 0 verified results and 3 self-reported results.

Where can I find the CLUEWSC paper?

The CLUEWSC paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.05986. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does CLUEWSC cover?

CLUEWSC is categorized under language and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models with multilingual support.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all language
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

language
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

language
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models