ComplexFuncBench

ComplexFuncBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' capabilities in handling complex function calling scenarios. It encompasses multi-step and constrained function calling tasks that require long-parameter filling, parameter value reasoning, and managing contexts up to 128k tokens. The benchmark includes 1,000 samples across five real-world scenarios.

GPT-4o from OpenAI currently leads the ComplexFuncBench leaderboard with a score of 0.665 across 6 evaluated AI models.

Paper

OpenAIGPT-4o leads with 66.5%, followed by OpenAIGPT-4.1 at 65.5% and OpenAIGPT-4.5 at 63.0%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on ComplexFuncBench

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

ComplexFuncBench Leaderboard

6 models
ContextCostLicense
1
OpenAI
OpenAI
128K$2.50 / $10.00
2
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.0M$2.00 / $8.00
3
OpenAI
OpenAI
128K$75.00 / $150.00
41.0M$0.40 / $1.60
5
OpenAI
OpenAI
200K$1.10 / $4.40
61.0M$0.10 / $0.40
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about ComplexFuncBench.

What is the ComplexFuncBench benchmark?

ComplexFuncBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' capabilities in handling complex function calling scenarios. It encompasses multi-step and constrained function calling tasks that require long-parameter filling, parameter value reasoning, and managing contexts up to 128k tokens. The benchmark includes 1,000 samples across five real-world scenarios.

What is the ComplexFuncBench leaderboard?

The ComplexFuncBench leaderboard ranks 6 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, GPT-4o by OpenAI leads with a score of 0.665. The average score across all models is 0.446.

What is the highest ComplexFuncBench score?

The highest ComplexFuncBench score is 0.665, achieved by GPT-4o from OpenAI.

How many models are evaluated on ComplexFuncBench?

6 models have been evaluated on the ComplexFuncBench benchmark, with 0 verified results and 6 self-reported results.

Where can I find the ComplexFuncBench paper?

The ComplexFuncBench paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10132. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does ComplexFuncBench cover?

ComplexFuncBench is categorized under long context, reasoning, structured output, and tool calling. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all long context
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models