CyBench

CyBench is a suite of Capture-the-Flag (CTF) challenges measuring agentic cyber attack capabilities. It evaluates dual-use cybersecurity knowledge and measures the 'unguided success rate', where agents complete tasks end-to-end without guidance on appropriate subtasks.

Claude Mythos Preview from Anthropic currently leads the CyBench leaderboard with a score of 1.000 across 2 evaluated AI models.

Paper

AnthropicClaude Mythos Preview leads with 100.0%, followed by xAIGrok-4.1 Thinking at 39.0%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on CyBench

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

CyBench Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
1
2
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about CyBench.

What is the CyBench benchmark?

CyBench is a suite of Capture-the-Flag (CTF) challenges measuring agentic cyber attack capabilities. It evaluates dual-use cybersecurity knowledge and measures the 'unguided success rate', where agents complete tasks end-to-end without guidance on appropriate subtasks.

What is the CyBench leaderboard?

The CyBench leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Claude Mythos Preview by Anthropic leads with a score of 1.000. The average score across all models is 0.695.

What is the highest CyBench score?

The highest CyBench score is 1.000, achieved by Claude Mythos Preview from Anthropic.

How many models are evaluated on CyBench?

2 models have been evaluated on the CyBench benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the CyBench paper?

The CyBench paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08926. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does CyBench cover?

CyBench is categorized under safety, agents, and code. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all safety
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

code
89 models
LiveCodeBench

LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.

code
71 models
HumanEval

A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics

code
66 models
BrowseComp

BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.

agents
45 models
Terminal-Bench 2.0

Terminal-Bench 2.0 is an updated benchmark for testing AI agents' tool use ability to operate a computer via terminal. It evaluates how well models can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

agents
39 models
SWE-bench Multilingual

A multilingual benchmark for issue resolving in software engineering that covers Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++. Contains 1,632 high-quality instances carefully annotated from 2,456 candidates by 68 expert annotators, designed to evaluate Large Language Models across diverse software ecosystems beyond Python.

code
27 models