Design2Code
Design2Code evaluates the ability to generate code (HTML/CSS/JS) from visual designs.
GLM-5V-Turbo from Zhipu AI currently leads the Design2Code leaderboard with a score of 0.948 across 2 evaluated AI models.
What Design2Code measures
Design2Code is a image benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal, code, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 2 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 100. Current average across reported models is 0.9, with the leader reaching 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for code and best AI for vision leaderboards.
GLM-5V-Turbo leads with 0.9%, followed by 
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at 0.9%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Design2Code
Design2Code Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zhipu AI | — | — | — | ||
| 2 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about Design2Code.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.
A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.