DynaMath

A multimodal mathematics and reasoning benchmark focused on dynamic visual problem solving.

Qwen3.6 Plus from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the DynaMath leaderboard with a score of 0.880 across 5 evaluated AI models.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.6 Plus leads with 88.0%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-27B at 87.7% and Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-122B-A10B at 85.9%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on DynaMath

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

DynaMath Leaderboard

5 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.50 / $3.00
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
122B262K$0.40 / $3.20
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
28B262K$0.60 / $3.60
5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B262K$0.25 / $2.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about DynaMath.

What is the DynaMath benchmark?

A multimodal mathematics and reasoning benchmark focused on dynamic visual problem solving.

What is the DynaMath leaderboard?

The DynaMath leaderboard ranks 5 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Qwen3.6 Plus by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team leads with a score of 0.880. The average score across all models is 0.864.

What is the highest DynaMath score?

The highest DynaMath score is 0.880, achieved by Qwen3.6 Plus from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

How many models are evaluated on DynaMath?

5 models have been evaluated on the DynaMath benchmark, with 0 verified results and 5 self-reported results.

What categories does DynaMath cover?

DynaMath is categorized under math, multimodal, reasoning, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all math
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

math
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

math
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

math
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

mathmultimodal
74 models