EgoSchema
A diagnostic benchmark for very long-form video language understanding consisting of over 5000 human curated multiple choice questions based on 3-minute video clips from Ego4D, covering a broad range of natural human activities and behaviors
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the EgoSchema leaderboard with a score of 0.779 across 9 evaluated AI models.
What EgoSchema measures
EgoSchema is a video benchmark that evaluates large language models on long context, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 9 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.7, with the leader reaching 0.8.
Compare leaders on the best AI for long context, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understanding
- Authors
- Karttikeya Mangalam, Raiymbek Akshulakov, Jitendra Malik
- Published
- arXiv
- 2308.09126
Abstract
We introduce EgoSchema, a very long-form video question-answering dataset, and benchmark to evaluate long video understanding capabilities of modern vision and language systems. Derived from Ego4D, EgoSchema consists of over 5000 human curated multiple choice question answer pairs, spanning over 250 hours of real video data, covering a very broad range of natural human activity and behavior. For each question, EgoSchema requires the correct answer to be selected between five given options based on a three-minute-long video clip. While some prior works have proposed video datasets with long clip lengths, we posit that merely the length of the video clip does not truly capture the temporal difficulty of the video task that is being considered. To remedy this, we introduce temporal certificate sets, a general notion for capturing the intrinsic temporal understanding length associated with a broad range of video understanding tasks & datasets. Based on this metric, we find EgoSchema to have intrinsic temporal lengths over 5.7x longer than the second closest dataset and 10x to 100x longer than any other video understanding dataset. Further, our evaluation of several current state-of-the-art video and language models shows them to be severely lacking in long-term video understanding capabilities. Even models with several billions of parameters achieve QA accuracy less than 33% (random is 20%) on the EgoSchema multi-choice question answering task, while humans achieve about 76% accuracy. We posit that \name{}{}, with its long intrinsic temporal structures and diverse complexity, would serve as a valuable evaluation probe for developing effective long-term video understanding systems in the future. Data and Zero-shot model evaluation code are open-sourced for both public and commercial use under the Ego4D license at http://egoschema.github.io
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct leads with 77.9%, followed by
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct at 76.2% and GPT-4o at 72.2%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on EgoSchema
EgoSchema Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 73B | — | — | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 3 | OpenAI | — | 128K | $2.50 / $10.00 | ||
| 4 | Amazon | — | — | — | ||
| 5 | Google | — | — | — | ||
| 6 | Amazon | — | — | — | ||
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 7B | — | — | ||
| 8 | Google | — | — | — | ||
| 9 | Google | — | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about EgoSchema.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions