EgoSchema

A diagnostic benchmark for very long-form video language understanding consisting of over 5000 human curated multiple choice questions based on 3-minute video clips from Ego4D, covering a broad range of natural human activities and behaviors

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the EgoSchema leaderboard with a score of 0.779 across 9 evaluated AI models.

Paper
About this benchmark

What EgoSchema measures

EgoSchema is a video benchmark that evaluates large language models on long context, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 9 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.7, with the leader reaching 0.8.

Compare leaders on the best AI for long context, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.

Publication

Paper
EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understanding
Authors
Karttikeya Mangalam, Raiymbek Akshulakov, Jitendra Malik
Published

Abstract

We introduce EgoSchema, a very long-form video question-answering dataset, and benchmark to evaluate long video understanding capabilities of modern vision and language systems. Derived from Ego4D, EgoSchema consists of over 5000 human curated multiple choice question answer pairs, spanning over 250 hours of real video data, covering a very broad range of natural human activity and behavior. For each question, EgoSchema requires the correct answer to be selected between five given options based on a three-minute-long video clip. While some prior works have proposed video datasets with long clip lengths, we posit that merely the length of the video clip does not truly capture the temporal difficulty of the video task that is being considered. To remedy this, we introduce temporal certificate sets, a general notion for capturing the intrinsic temporal understanding length associated with a broad range of video understanding tasks & datasets. Based on this metric, we find EgoSchema to have intrinsic temporal lengths over 5.7x longer than the second closest dataset and 10x to 100x longer than any other video understanding dataset. Further, our evaluation of several current state-of-the-art video and language models shows them to be severely lacking in long-term video understanding capabilities. Even models with several billions of parameters achieve QA accuracy less than 33% (random is 20%) on the EgoSchema multi-choice question answering task, while humans achieve about 76% accuracy. We posit that \name{}{}, with its long intrinsic temporal structures and diverse complexity, would serve as a valuable evaluation probe for developing effective long-term video understanding systems in the future. Data and Zero-shot model evaluation code are open-sourced for both public and commercial use under the Ego4D license at http://egoschema.github.io

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen2-VL-72B-Instruct leads with 77.9%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct at 76.2% and OpenAIGPT-4o at 72.2%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on EgoSchema

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

EgoSchema Leaderboard

9 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
73B
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
72B
3
OpenAI
OpenAI
128K$2.50 / $10.00
4
Amazon
Amazon
5
6
Amazon
Amazon
7
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
7B
8
9
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about EgoSchema.

What is the EgoSchema benchmark?

A diagnostic benchmark for very long-form video language understanding consisting of over 5000 human curated multiple choice questions based on 3-minute video clips from Ego4D, covering a broad range of natural human activities and behaviors

What is the EgoSchema leaderboard?

The EgoSchema leaderboard ranks 9 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team leads with a score of 0.779. The average score across all models is 0.703.

What is the highest EgoSchema score?

The highest EgoSchema score is 0.779, achieved by Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

How many models are evaluated on EgoSchema?

9 models have been evaluated on the EgoSchema benchmark, with 0 verified results and 9 self-reported results.

Where can I find the EgoSchema paper?

The EgoSchema paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.09126. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does EgoSchema cover?

EgoSchema is categorized under long context, reasoning, and vision. The benchmark evaluates video models.

What is the best open-source model on EgoSchema?

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team is the top-ranked open-source model on EgoSchema, with a score of 0.779 (rank #1).

Which model offers the best value on EgoSchema?

Among models scoring within 10% of the leader, GPT-4o from OpenAI is the cheapest, at $2.50 per million input tokens with a score of 0.722.

How recent are the EgoSchema leaderboard results?

The EgoSchema leaderboard was last updated in June 2026 and currently includes 9 evaluated models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all long context
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
224 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
127 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
114 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
100 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
100 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
82 models