The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

FigQA

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on FigQA

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

FigQA Leaderboard

3 models
ContextCostLicense
1
21.0M$5.00 / $25.00
3
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is FigQA?

FigQA is a multiple-choice benchmark on interpreting scientific figures from biology papers. It evaluates dual-use biological knowledge and multimodal reasoning relevant to bioweapons development.

FigQA is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on safety, healthcare, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 3 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.7, with the leader at 0.9.

Compare leaders on the best AI for safety, best AI for healthcare and best AI for vision leaderboards.

Current leaders

Claude Mythos Preview from Anthropic currently leads the FigQA leaderboard with a score of 0.890 across 3 evaluated AI models.

1Claude Mythos PreviewAnthropic89.0%
2Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic78.3%

Source paper

Title
LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research
Authors
Jon M. Laurent, Joseph D. Janizek, Michael Ruzo, Michaela M. Hinks, and 5 others
Published
Abstract

There is widespread optimism that frontier Large Language Models (LLMs) and LLM-augmented systems have the potential to rapidly accelerate scientific discovery across disciplines. Today, many benchmarks exist to measure LLM knowledge and reasoning on textbook-style science questions, but few if any benchmarks are designed to evaluate language model performance on practical tasks required for scientific research, such as literature search, protocol planning, and data analysis. As a step toward building such benchmarks, we introduce the Language Agent Biology Benchmark (LAB-Bench), a broad dataset of over 2,400 multiple choice questions for evaluating AI systems on a range of practical biology research capabilities, including recall and reasoning over literature, interpretation of figures, access and navigation of databases, and comprehension and manipulation of DNA and protein sequences. Importantly, in contrast to previous scientific benchmarks, we expect that an AI system that can achieve consistently high scores on the more difficult LAB-Bench tasks would serve as a useful assistant for researchers in areas such as literature search and molecular cloning. As an initial assessment of the emergent scientific task capabilities of frontier language models, we measure performance of several against our benchmark and report results compared to human expert biology researchers. We will continue to update and expand LAB-Bench over time, and expect it to serve as a useful tool in the development of automated research systems going forward. A public subset of LAB-Bench is available for use at the following URL: https://huggingface.co/datasets/futurehouse/lab-bench

FAQ

Common questions about the FigQA benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the FigQA benchmark?

FigQA is a multiple-choice benchmark on interpreting scientific figures from biology papers. It evaluates dual-use biological knowledge and multimodal reasoning relevant to bioweapons development.

What is the FigQA leaderboard?

The FigQA leaderboard ranks 3 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Claude Mythos Preview by Anthropic leads with a score of 0.890. The average score across all models is 0.671.

What is the highest FigQA score?

The highest FigQA score is 0.890, achieved by Claude Mythos Preview from Anthropic.

How many models are evaluated on FigQA?

3 models have been evaluated on the FigQA benchmark, with 0 verified results and 3 self-reported results.

Where can I find the FigQA paper?

The FigQA paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10362. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does FigQA cover?

FigQA is categorized under safety, healthcare, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

How recent are the FigQA leaderboard results?

The FigQA leaderboard was last updated in August 2026 and currently includes 3 evaluated models.