FlenQA

Flexible Length Question Answering dataset for evaluating the impact of input length on reasoning performance of language models, featuring True/False questions embedded in contexts of varying lengths (250-3000 tokens) across three reasoning tasks: Monotone Relations, People In Rooms, and simplified Ruletaker

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus from Microsoft currently leads the FlenQA leaderboard with a score of 0.979 across 2 evaluated AI models.

Paper
About this benchmark

What FlenQA measures

FlenQA is a text benchmark that evaluates large language models on long context and reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 2 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 1.0, with the leader reaching 1.0.

Compare leaders on the best AI for long context and best AI for reasoning leaderboards.

Publication

Paper
Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Models
Authors
Mosh Levy, Alon Jacoby, Yoav Goldberg
Published

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of extending input lengths on the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). Despite LLMs advancements in recent times, their performance consistency across different input lengths is not well understood. We investigate this aspect by introducing a novel QA reasoning framework, specifically designed to assess the impact of input length. We isolate the effect of input length using multiple versions of the same sample, each being extended with padding of different lengths, types and locations. Our findings show a notable degradation in LLMs' reasoning performance at much shorter input lengths than their technical maximum. We show that the degradation trend appears in every version of our dataset, although at different intensities. Additionally, our study reveals that the traditional metric of next word prediction correlates negatively with performance of LLMs' on our reasoning dataset. We analyse our results and identify failure modes that can serve as useful guides for future research, potentially informing strategies to address the limitations observed in LLMs.

MicrosoftPhi 4 Reasoning Plus leads with 97.9%, followed by MicrosoftPhi 4 Reasoning at 97.7%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on FlenQA

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

FlenQA Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
114B
214B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about FlenQA.

What is the FlenQA benchmark?

Flexible Length Question Answering dataset for evaluating the impact of input length on reasoning performance of language models, featuring True/False questions embedded in contexts of varying lengths (250-3000 tokens) across three reasoning tasks: Monotone Relations, People In Rooms, and simplified Ruletaker

What is the FlenQA leaderboard?

The FlenQA leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus by Microsoft leads with a score of 0.979. The average score across all models is 0.978.

What is the highest FlenQA score?

The highest FlenQA score is 0.979, achieved by Phi 4 Reasoning Plus from Microsoft.

How many models are evaluated on FlenQA?

2 models have been evaluated on the FlenQA benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the FlenQA paper?

The FlenQA paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14848. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does FlenQA cover?

FlenQA is categorized under long context and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

What is the best open-source model on FlenQA?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus by Microsoft is the top-ranked open-source model on FlenQA, with a score of 0.979 (rank #1).

How recent are the FlenQA leaderboard results?

The FlenQA leaderboard was last updated in June 2026 and currently includes 2 evaluated models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all long context
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
224 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
127 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
114 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
100 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
100 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
82 models