FrontierScience Research

FrontierScience Research is a benchmark evaluating AI models on cutting-edge scientific research questions requiring deep domain expertise, multi-step reasoning, and synthesis of complex scientific concepts across disciplines.

Muse Spark from Meta currently leads the FrontierScience Research leaderboard with a score of 0.383 across 1 evaluated AI models.

MetaMuse Spark leads with 38.3%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on FrontierScience Research

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

FrontierScience Research Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about FrontierScience Research.

What is the FrontierScience Research benchmark?

FrontierScience Research is a benchmark evaluating AI models on cutting-edge scientific research questions requiring deep domain expertise, multi-step reasoning, and synthesis of complex scientific concepts across disciplines.

What is the FrontierScience Research leaderboard?

The FrontierScience Research leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Muse Spark by Meta leads with a score of 0.383. The average score across all models is 0.383.

What is the highest FrontierScience Research score?

The highest FrontierScience Research score is 0.383, achieved by Muse Spark from Meta.

How many models are evaluated on FrontierScience Research?

1 models have been evaluated on the FrontierScience Research benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

What categories does FrontierScience Research cover?

FrontierScience Research is categorized under reasoning and science. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all reasoning
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models