GeneBench
GeneBench is an evaluation focused on multi-stage scientific data analysis in genetics and quantitative biology. Tasks require reasoning about ambiguous or noisy data with minimal supervisory guidance, addressing realistic obstacles such as hidden confounders or QC failures, and correctly implementing and interpreting modern statistical methods.
GPT-5.5 Pro from OpenAI currently leads the GeneBench leaderboard with a score of 0.332 across 2 evaluated AI models.
GPT-5.5 Pro leads with 33.2%, followed by GPT-5.5 at 25.0%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on GeneBench
GeneBench Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 2 | OpenAI | — | 1.1M | $5.00 / $30.00 |
FAQ
Common questions about GeneBench.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions