GPQA Physics

Physics subset of GPQA, containing challenging multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in physics. These Google-proof questions require graduate-level knowledge and reasoning.

o1 from OpenAI currently leads the GPQA Physics leaderboard with a score of 0.928 across 1 evaluated AI models.

Paper

OpenAIo1 leads with 92.8%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on GPQA Physics

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

GPQA Physics Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1
OpenAI
OpenAI
200K$15.00 / $60.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about GPQA Physics.

What is the GPQA Physics benchmark?

Physics subset of GPQA, containing challenging multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in physics. These Google-proof questions require graduate-level knowledge and reasoning.

What is the GPQA Physics leaderboard?

The GPQA Physics leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, o1 by OpenAI leads with a score of 0.928. The average score across all models is 0.928.

What is the highest GPQA Physics score?

The highest GPQA Physics score is 0.928, achieved by o1 from OpenAI.

How many models are evaluated on GPQA Physics?

1 models have been evaluated on the GPQA Physics benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

Where can I find the GPQA Physics paper?

The GPQA Physics paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12022. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does GPQA Physics cover?

GPQA Physics is categorized under physics and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all physics
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

physics
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models