Graphwalks parents <128k

A graph reasoning benchmark that evaluates language models' ability to find parent nodes in graphs with context length under 128k tokens, requiring understanding of graph structure and edge relationships.

GPT-5.4 from OpenAI currently leads the Graphwalks parents <128k leaderboard with a score of 0.898 across 11 evaluated AI models.

OpenAIGPT-5.4 leads with 89.8%, followed by OpenAIGPT-5.2 at 89.0% and OpenAIGPT-5 at 73.3%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Graphwalks parents <128k

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

Graphwalks parents <128k Leaderboard

11 models
ContextCostLicense
1
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.0M$2.50 / $15.00
2
OpenAI
OpenAI
400K$1.75 / $14.00
3
OpenAI
OpenAI
4
OpenAI
OpenAI
128K$75.00 / $150.00
5400K$0.75 / $4.50
61.0M$0.40 / $1.60
7
OpenAI
OpenAI
200K$1.10 / $4.40
8
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.0M$2.00 / $8.00
9400K$0.20 / $1.25
10
OpenAI
OpenAI
128K$2.50 / $10.00
111.0M$0.10 / $0.40
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about Graphwalks parents <128k.

What is the Graphwalks parents <128k benchmark?

A graph reasoning benchmark that evaluates language models' ability to find parent nodes in graphs with context length under 128k tokens, requiring understanding of graph structure and edge relationships.

What is the Graphwalks parents <128k leaderboard?

The Graphwalks parents <128k leaderboard ranks 11 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, GPT-5.4 by OpenAI leads with a score of 0.898. The average score across all models is 0.608.

What is the highest Graphwalks parents <128k score?

The highest Graphwalks parents <128k score is 0.898, achieved by GPT-5.4 from OpenAI.

How many models are evaluated on Graphwalks parents <128k?

11 models have been evaluated on the Graphwalks parents <128k benchmark, with 0 verified results and 11 self-reported results.

What categories does Graphwalks parents <128k cover?

Graphwalks parents <128k is categorized under reasoning and spatial reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all reasoning
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models