HMMT Feb 26

HMMT February 2026 is a math competition benchmark based on problems from the Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament, testing advanced mathematical problem-solving and reasoning.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max from DeepSeek currently leads the HMMT Feb 26 leaderboard with a score of 0.952 across 7 evaluated AI models.

DeepSeekDeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max leads with 95.2%, followed by DeepSeekDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max at 94.8% and Moonshot AIKimi K2.6 at 92.7%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on HMMT Feb 26

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

HMMT Feb 26 Leaderboard

7 models
ContextCostLicense
11.6T1.0M$1.74 / $3.48
2284B1.0M$0.14 / $0.28
3
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T262K$0.95 / $4.00
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.50 / $3.00
5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
28B262K$0.60 / $3.60
6
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B
7
Zhipu AI
Zhipu AI
754B200K$1.40 / $4.40
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about HMMT Feb 26.

What is the HMMT Feb 26 benchmark?

HMMT February 2026 is a math competition benchmark based on problems from the Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament, testing advanced mathematical problem-solving and reasoning.

What is the HMMT Feb 26 leaderboard?

The HMMT Feb 26 leaderboard ranks 7 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max by DeepSeek leads with a score of 0.952. The average score across all models is 0.887.

What is the highest HMMT Feb 26 score?

The highest HMMT Feb 26 score is 0.952, achieved by DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max from DeepSeek.

How many models are evaluated on HMMT Feb 26?

7 models have been evaluated on the HMMT Feb 26 benchmark, with 0 verified results and 7 self-reported results.

What categories does HMMT Feb 26 cover?

HMMT Feb 26 is categorized under math and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all math
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

math
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

math
108 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

math
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

mathmultimodal
74 models