HMMT Feb 26
HMMT February 2026 is a math competition benchmark based on problems from the Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament, testing advanced mathematical problem-solving and reasoning.
Qwen3.7 Max from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the HMMT Feb 26 leaderboard with a score of 0.971 across 9 evaluated AI models.
What HMMT Feb 26 measures
HMMT Feb 26 is a text benchmark that evaluates large language models on math and reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 9 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.9, with the leader reaching 1.0.
Compare leaders on the best AI for math and best AI for reasoning leaderboards.
Qwen3.7 Max leads with 97.1%, followed by 
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max at 95.2% and DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max at 94.8%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on HMMT Feb 26
HMMT Feb 26 Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $1.25 / $3.75 | ||
| 2 | DeepSeek | 1.6T | 1.0M | $1.74 / $3.48 | ||
| 3 | DeepSeek | 284B | 1.0M | $0.14 / $0.28 | ||
| 4 |  Moonshot AI | 1.0T | 262K | $0.95 / $4.00 | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 6 |  Microsoft | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28B | 262K | $0.60 / $3.60 | ||
| 8 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | — | — | ||
| 9 |  Zhipu AI | 754B | 200K | $1.40 / $4.40 |
FAQ
Common questions about HMMT Feb 26.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions