HumanEval-ER

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on HumanEval-ER

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

HumanEval-ER Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is HumanEval-ER?

A variant of the HumanEval benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics

HumanEval-ER is a text benchmark evaluating models on reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 0.8.

Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning leaderboards.

Current leaders

Kimi K2 Instruct from Moonshot AI currently leads the HumanEval-ER leaderboard with a score of 0.811 across 1 evaluated AI models.

1Kimi K2 InstructMoonshot AI81.1%

Source paper

Title
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Authors
Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, and 54 others
Published
Abstract

We introduce Codex, a GPT language model fine-tuned on publicly available code from GitHub, and study its Python code-writing capabilities. A distinct production version of Codex powers GitHub Copilot. On HumanEval, a new evaluation set we release to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, our model solves 28.8% of the problems, while GPT-3 solves 0% and GPT-J solves 11.4%. Furthermore, we find that repeated sampling from the model is a surprisingly effective strategy for producing working solutions to difficult prompts. Using this method, we solve 70.2% of our problems with 100 samples per problem. Careful investigation of our model reveals its limitations, including difficulty with docstrings describing long chains of operations and with binding operations to variables. Finally, we discuss the potential broader impacts of deploying powerful code generation technologies, covering safety, security, and economics.

FAQ

Common questions about the HumanEval-ER benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the HumanEval-ER benchmark?

A variant of the HumanEval benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics

What is the HumanEval-ER leaderboard?

The HumanEval-ER leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Kimi K2 Instruct by Moonshot AI leads with a score of 0.811. The average score across all models is 0.811.

What is the highest HumanEval-ER score?

The highest HumanEval-ER score is 0.811, achieved by Kimi K2 Instruct from Moonshot AI.

How many models are evaluated on HumanEval-ER?

1 models have been evaluated on the HumanEval-ER benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

Where can I find the HumanEval-ER paper?

The HumanEval-ER paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does HumanEval-ER cover?

HumanEval-ER is categorized under reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

What is the best open-source model on HumanEval-ER?

Kimi K2 Instruct by Moonshot AI is the top-ranked open-source model on HumanEval-ER, with a score of 0.811 (rank #1).

How recent are the HumanEval-ER leaderboard results?

The HumanEval-ER leaderboard was last updated in July 2026 and currently includes 1 evaluated models.