HumanEval-Mul

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on HumanEval-Mul

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

HumanEval-Mul Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
1
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
671B
2236B
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is HumanEval-Mul?

A multilingual variant of the HumanEval benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics

HumanEval-Mul is a text benchmark evaluating models on reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 2 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 0.8.

Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning leaderboards.

Current leaders

DeepSeek-V3 from DeepSeek currently leads the HumanEval-Mul leaderboard with a score of 0.826 across 2 evaluated AI models.

1DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek82.6%
2DeepSeek-V2.5DeepSeek73.8%

Source paper

Title
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Authors
Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, and 54 others
Published
Abstract

We introduce Codex, a GPT language model fine-tuned on publicly available code from GitHub, and study its Python code-writing capabilities. A distinct production version of Codex powers GitHub Copilot. On HumanEval, a new evaluation set we release to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, our model solves 28.8% of the problems, while GPT-3 solves 0% and GPT-J solves 11.4%. Furthermore, we find that repeated sampling from the model is a surprisingly effective strategy for producing working solutions to difficult prompts. Using this method, we solve 70.2% of our problems with 100 samples per problem. Careful investigation of our model reveals its limitations, including difficulty with docstrings describing long chains of operations and with binding operations to variables. Finally, we discuss the potential broader impacts of deploying powerful code generation technologies, covering safety, security, and economics.

FAQ

Common questions about the HumanEval-Mul benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the HumanEval-Mul benchmark?

A multilingual variant of the HumanEval benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics

What is the HumanEval-Mul leaderboard?

The HumanEval-Mul leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, DeepSeek-V3 by DeepSeek leads with a score of 0.826. The average score across all models is 0.782.

What is the highest HumanEval-Mul score?

The highest HumanEval-Mul score is 0.826, achieved by DeepSeek-V3 from DeepSeek.

How many models are evaluated on HumanEval-Mul?

2 models have been evaluated on the HumanEval-Mul benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the HumanEval-Mul paper?

The HumanEval-Mul paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does HumanEval-Mul cover?

HumanEval-Mul is categorized under reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models with multilingual support.

What is the best open-source model on HumanEval-Mul?

DeepSeek-V3 by DeepSeek is the top-ranked open-source model on HumanEval-Mul, with a score of 0.826 (rank #1).

How recent are the HumanEval-Mul leaderboard results?

The HumanEval-Mul leaderboard was last updated in July 2026 and currently includes 2 evaluated models.