HumanEvalFIM-Average
Average evaluation of HumanEval Fill-in-the-Middle benchmark variants (single-line, multi-line, random-span) for assessing code infilling capabilities of language models
Codestral-22B from Mistral AI currently leads the HumanEvalFIM-Average leaderboard with a score of 0.916 across 1 evaluated AI models.
Codestral-22B leads with 91.6%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on HumanEvalFIM-Average
HumanEvalFIM-Average Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mistral AI | 22B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about HumanEvalFIM-Average.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.