InterGPS

Interpretable Geometry Problem Solver (Inter-GPS) with Geometry3K dataset of 3,002 geometry problems with dense annotation in formal language using theorem knowledge and symbolic reasoning

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct from Microsoft currently leads the InterGPS leaderboard with a score of 0.486 across 2 evaluated AI models.

Paper

MicrosoftPhi-4-multimodal-instruct leads with 48.6%, followed by MicrosoftPhi-3.5-vision-instruct at 36.3%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on InterGPS

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

InterGPS Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
16B128K$0.05 / $0.10
24B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about InterGPS.

What is the InterGPS benchmark?

Interpretable Geometry Problem Solver (Inter-GPS) with Geometry3K dataset of 3,002 geometry problems with dense annotation in formal language using theorem knowledge and symbolic reasoning

What is the InterGPS leaderboard?

The InterGPS leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct by Microsoft leads with a score of 0.486. The average score across all models is 0.424.

What is the highest InterGPS score?

The highest InterGPS score is 0.486, achieved by Phi-4-multimodal-instruct from Microsoft.

How many models are evaluated on InterGPS?

2 models have been evaluated on the InterGPS benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the InterGPS paper?

The InterGPS paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.04165. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does InterGPS cover?

InterGPS is categorized under math and spatial reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all math
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

math
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

math
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

math
99 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

mathmultimodal
74 models
MATH

MATH dataset contains 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels (1-5) across seven mathematical subjects including Prealgebra, Algebra, Number Theory, Counting and Probability, Geometry, Intermediate Algebra, and Precalculus.

math
70 models
AIME 2024

American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024, consisting of 30 challenging mathematical reasoning problems from AIME I and AIME II competitions. Each problem requires an integer answer between 0-999 and tests advanced mathematical reasoning across algebra, geometry, combinatorics, and number theory. Used as a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning capabilities in large language models at Olympiad-level difficulty.

math
53 models