IPhO 2025

International Physics Olympiad 2025 (theory) comprises all 3 theory problems from the official 2025 IPhO competition. Results are based on blinded human evaluation with guidelines based on the official competition scoring, validated by domain experts.

Muse Spark from Meta currently leads the IPhO 2025 leaderboard with a score of 0.826 across 1 evaluated AI models.

About this benchmark

What IPhO 2025 measures

IPhO 2025 is a text benchmark that evaluates large language models on physics and reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 model on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.8, with the leader reaching 0.8.

Compare leaders on the best AI for physics and best AI for reasoning leaderboards.

MetaMuse Spark leads with 82.6%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on IPhO 2025

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

IPhO 2025 Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about IPhO 2025.

What is the IPhO 2025 benchmark?

International Physics Olympiad 2025 (theory) comprises all 3 theory problems from the official 2025 IPhO competition. Results are based on blinded human evaluation with guidelines based on the official competition scoring, validated by domain experts.

What is the IPhO 2025 leaderboard?

The IPhO 2025 leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Muse Spark by Meta leads with a score of 0.826. The average score across all models is 0.826.

What is the highest IPhO 2025 score?

The highest IPhO 2025 score is 0.826, achieved by Muse Spark from Meta.

How many models are evaluated on IPhO 2025?

1 models have been evaluated on the IPhO 2025 benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

What categories does IPhO 2025 cover?

IPhO 2025 is categorized under physics and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

How recent are the IPhO 2025 leaderboard results?

The IPhO 2025 leaderboard was last updated in June 2026 and currently includes 1 evaluated models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all physics
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

physics
224 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
127 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
114 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
100 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
100 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
82 models
IPhO 2025 Leaderboard