LMArena Text Leaderboard

LMArena Text Leaderboard is a blind human preference evaluation benchmark that ranks models based on pairwise comparisons in real-world conversations. The leaderboard uses Elo ratings computed from user preferences in head-to-head model battles, providing a comprehensive measure of overall model capability and style.

Grok-4.1 Thinking from xAI currently leads the LMArena Text Leaderboard leaderboard with a score of 1483.000 across 2 evaluated AI models.

PaperImplementation

xAIGrok-4.1 Thinking leads with 1483.000, followed by xAIGrok-4.1 at 1465.000.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on LMArena Text Leaderboard

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

LMArena Text Leaderboard Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
1
2
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about LMArena Text Leaderboard.

What is the LMArena Text Leaderboard benchmark?

LMArena Text Leaderboard is a blind human preference evaluation benchmark that ranks models based on pairwise comparisons in real-world conversations. The leaderboard uses Elo ratings computed from user preferences in head-to-head model battles, providing a comprehensive measure of overall model capability and style.

What is the LMArena Text Leaderboard leaderboard?

The LMArena Text Leaderboard leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Grok-4.1 Thinking by xAI leads with a score of 1483.000. The average score across all models is 1474.000.

What is the highest LMArena Text Leaderboard score?

The highest LMArena Text Leaderboard score is 1483.000, achieved by Grok-4.1 Thinking from xAI.

How many models are evaluated on LMArena Text Leaderboard?

2 models have been evaluated on the LMArena Text Leaderboard benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the LMArena Text Leaderboard paper?

The LMArena Text Leaderboard paper is available at https://arena.lmsys.org/. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

Where can I find the LMArena Text Leaderboard dataset?

The LMArena Text Leaderboard dataset is available at https://arena.lmsys.org/.

What categories does LMArena Text Leaderboard cover?

LMArena Text Leaderboard is categorized under general and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all general
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

general
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
108 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

general
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models