The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MATH (CoT)

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MATH (CoT)

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MATH (CoT) Leaderboard

6 models
ContextCostLicense
170B
214B
2
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
675B
48B
53B
68B
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is MATH (CoT)?

MATH dataset contains 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels (1-5) across seven mathematical subjects. This variant uses Chain-of-Thought prompting to encourage step-by-step reasoning.

MATH (CoT) is a text benchmark evaluating models on math and reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 6 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.6, with the leader at 0.7.

Compare leaders on the best AI for math and best AI for reasoning leaderboards.

Current leaders

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct from Meta currently leads the MATH (CoT) leaderboard with a score of 0.680 across 6 evaluated AI models.

Source paper

Title
Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset
Authors
Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Saurav Kadavath, Akul Arora, and 4 others
Published
Abstract

Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in machine learning models, we introduce MATH, a new dataset of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems. Each problem in MATH has a full step-by-step solution which can be used to teach models to generate answer derivations and explanations. To facilitate future research and increase accuracy on MATH, we also contribute a large auxiliary pretraining dataset which helps teach models the fundamentals of mathematics. Even though we are able to increase accuracy on MATH, our results show that accuracy remains relatively low, even with enormous Transformer models. Moreover, we find that simply increasing budgets and model parameter counts will be impractical for achieving strong mathematical reasoning if scaling trends continue. While scaling Transformers is automatically solving most other text-based tasks, scaling is not currently solving MATH. To have more traction on mathematical problem solving we will likely need new algorithmic advancements from the broader research community.

FAQ

Common questions about the MATH (CoT) benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the MATH (CoT) benchmark?

MATH dataset contains 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems from AMC 10, AMC 12, AIME, and other mathematics competitions. Each problem includes full step-by-step solutions and spans multiple difficulty levels (1-5) across seven mathematical subjects. This variant uses Chain-of-Thought prompting to encourage step-by-step reasoning.

What is the MATH (CoT) leaderboard?

The MATH (CoT) leaderboard ranks 6 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct by Meta leads with a score of 0.680. The average score across all models is 0.630.

What is the highest MATH (CoT) score?

The highest MATH (CoT) score is 0.680, achieved by Llama 3.1 70B Instruct from Meta.

How many models are evaluated on MATH (CoT)?

6 models have been evaluated on the MATH (CoT) benchmark, with 0 verified results and 6 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MATH (CoT) paper?

The MATH (CoT) paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03874. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MATH (CoT) cover?

MATH (CoT) is categorized under math and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

What is the best open-source model on MATH (CoT)?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct by Meta is the top-ranked open-source model on MATH (CoT), with a score of 0.680 (rank #1).

How recent are the MATH (CoT) leaderboard results?

The MATH (CoT) leaderboard was last updated in August 2026 and currently includes 6 evaluated models.