MBPP EvalPlus (base)

MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. EvalPlus extends MBPP with significantly more test cases (35x) for more rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code, providing high-quality and precise evaluation.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct from Meta currently leads the MBPP EvalPlus (base) leaderboard with a score of 0.728 across 1 evaluated AI models.

Paper

MetaLlama 3.1 8B Instruct leads with 72.8%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MBPP EvalPlus (base)

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MBPP EvalPlus (base) Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
18B131K$0.03 / $0.03
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about MBPP EvalPlus (base).

What is the MBPP EvalPlus (base) benchmark?

MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. EvalPlus extends MBPP with significantly more test cases (35x) for more rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code, providing high-quality and precise evaluation.

What is the MBPP EvalPlus (base) leaderboard?

The MBPP EvalPlus (base) leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct by Meta leads with a score of 0.728. The average score across all models is 0.728.

What is the highest MBPP EvalPlus (base) score?

The highest MBPP EvalPlus (base) score is 0.728, achieved by Llama 3.1 8B Instruct from Meta.

How many models are evaluated on MBPP EvalPlus (base)?

1 models have been evaluated on the MBPP EvalPlus (base) benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MBPP EvalPlus (base) paper?

The MBPP EvalPlus (base) paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07732. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MBPP EvalPlus (base) cover?

MBPP EvalPlus (base) is categorized under general and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all general
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

general
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

general
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models