MCP-Mark

MCP-Mark evaluates LLMs on their ability to use Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools effectively, testing tool discovery, selection, invocation, and result interpretation across diverse MCP server scenarios.

Kimi K2.7 Code from Moonshot AI currently leads the MCP-Mark leaderboard with a score of 0.811 across 7 evaluated AI models.

About this benchmark

What MCP-Mark measures

MCP-Mark is a text benchmark that evaluates large language models on agents and tool calling tasks. LLM Stats tracks 7 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.5, with the leader reaching 0.8.

Compare leaders on the best AI for agents and best AI for tool calling leaderboards.

Moonshot AIKimi K2.7 Code leads with 81.1%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.7 Max at 60.8% and Moonshot AIKimi K2.6 at 55.9%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MCP-Mark

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MCP-Mark Leaderboard

7 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T262K$0.95 / $4.00
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$1.25 / $3.75
3
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T262K$0.95 / $4.00
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.50 / $3.00
5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
397B262K$0.60 / $3.60
6685B
7
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about MCP-Mark.

What is the MCP-Mark benchmark?

MCP-Mark evaluates LLMs on their ability to use Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools effectively, testing tool discovery, selection, invocation, and result interpretation across diverse MCP server scenarios.

What is the MCP-Mark leaderboard?

The MCP-Mark leaderboard ranks 7 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Kimi K2.7 Code by Moonshot AI leads with a score of 0.811. The average score across all models is 0.524.

What is the highest MCP-Mark score?

The highest MCP-Mark score is 0.811, achieved by Kimi K2.7 Code from Moonshot AI.

How many models are evaluated on MCP-Mark?

7 models have been evaluated on the MCP-Mark benchmark, with 0 verified results and 7 self-reported results.

What categories does MCP-Mark cover?

MCP-Mark is categorized under agents and tool calling. The benchmark evaluates text models.

What is the best open-source model on MCP-Mark?

Kimi K2.7 Code by Moonshot AI is the top-ranked open-source model on MCP-Mark, with a score of 0.811 (rank #1).

Which model offers the best value on MCP-Mark?

Among models scoring within 10% of the leader, Kimi K2.7 Code from Moonshot AI is the cheapest, at $0.95 per million input tokens with a score of 0.811.

How recent are the MCP-Mark leaderboard results?

The MCP-Mark leaderboard was last updated in June 2026 and currently includes 7 evaluated models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all agents
BrowseComp

BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.

agents
48 models
Terminal-Bench 2.0

Terminal-Bench 2.0 is an updated benchmark for testing AI agents' tool use ability to operate a computer via terminal. It evaluates how well models can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

agents
47 models
Tau2 Telecom

τ²-Bench telecom domain evaluates conversational agents in a dual-control environment modeled as a Dec-POMDP, where both agent and user use tools in shared telecommunications troubleshooting scenarios that test coordination and communication capabilities.

tool calling
34 models
SWE-Bench Pro

SWE-Bench Pro is an advanced version of SWE-Bench that evaluates language models on complex, real-world software engineering tasks requiring extended reasoning and multi-step problem solving.

agents
29 models
Tau2 Retail

τ²-bench retail domain evaluates conversational AI agents in customer service scenarios within a dual-control environment where both agent and user can interact with tools. Tests tool-agent-user interaction, rule adherence, and task consistency in retail customer support contexts.

tool calling
26 models
TAU-bench Retail

A benchmark for evaluating tool-agent-user interaction in retail environments. Tests language agents' ability to handle dynamic conversations with users while using domain-specific API tools and following policy guidelines. Evaluates agents on tasks like order cancellations, address changes, and order status checks through multi-turn conversations.

tool calling
25 models